Influence of Sample Thickness and Capping on Characterization of Bedding Mortars from Historic Masonries by Double Punch Test (DPT)

Abstract:

For determination of compressive strength of bedding mortar used in historic masonries, a promising moderately-destructive technique is double punch test (DPT). DPT consists of loading prismatic samples of mortar (about 4×4×1 cm³) by means of two circular steel platens (typically 2 cm diameter) and then calculating mortar compressive strength as the ratio of the failure load to the cross section of the circular platens. In this study, the influence of mortar sample thickness and mortar sample capping on the reliability of results obtained by DPT was systematically investigated. The influence of sample thickness was assessed by comparing DPT results obtained for samples with 5, 10, 15 and 20 mm thickness with compressive strength determined by testing reference 4 cm-side cubes. Different mortars were considered (cement, lime-cement, natural hydraulic lime), in order to investigate a wide range of mortar mechanical characteristics. The influence of surface capping was evaluated on a lime-cement mortar by comparing compressive strength determined on reference cubes with strength obtained by DPT on proper samples, without capping and after capping with rubber, gypsum and cement. The results of the study indicate that sample thickness substantially influences mortar compressive strength determined by DPT, which may vary by up to three times depending on sample thickness. A good estimation of the actual mortar compressive strength was obtained when samples with thickness similar to the loading platens diameter were tested, which suggests that choosing the size of the loading platens for DPT based on the thickness of mortar joints under investigation may be an effective way for obtaining reliable estimations. As for the influence of surface capping, in those cases where no mortar sample regularization is possible, because of the poor quality of the mortar, the results of the study indicate that sample capping actually seems necessary in order to avoid significant underestimations of mortar compressive strength. Considering the higher practicality offered by gypsum with respect to rapid-setting cement for surface capping, the use of gypsum seems preferable.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 624)
• Pages: 322-329
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.624.322
• Online since: September 2014
• Authors: enrico sassoni*, Elisa Franzoni, Claudio Mazzotti
• Keywords: Core-Drilling, Mortar Compressive Strength, Non-Standard Samples, Pore Size Distribution, Semi-Destructive Techniques

References

[1] C. Mazzotti, E. Sassoni, G. Pagliai, Determination of shear strength of historic masonries by moderately destructive testing of masonry cores, Construction and Building Materials 54 (2014) 421-431.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.039

[2] M. Corradi, A. Borri, A. Vignoli, Experimental study on the determination of strength of masonry walls, Construction and Building Materials 17 (2003) 325-337.

DOI: 10.1016/s0950-0618(03)00007-2

[3] L. Binda, A. Saisi, C. Tiraboschi, Investigation procedures for the diagnosis of historic masonries, Construction and Building Materials 14 (2000) 199-233.

DOI: 10.1016/s0950-0618(00)00018-0

[4] E. Sassoni, C. Mazzotti, The use of small diameter cores for assessing the compressive strength of clay brick masonries, Journal of Cultural Heritage 14S (2013) e95-e101.

DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2012.11.027

[5] E. Sassoni, C. Mazzotti, G. Pagliai, Comparison between experimental methods for evaluating the compressive strength of existing masonry buildings, Construction and Building Materials (submitted).

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.070

[6] D.M. 14/01/2008 (Decreto del Ministero delle Infrastrutture 14 gennaio 2008), Approvazione delle nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioni, 2008 [in Italian].

[7] Eurocode 6, UNI ENV 1996-1-1, Design of masonry structures - Part 1-1: General rules for buildings - Rules for reinforced and unreinforced masonry, (1998).

DOI: 10.3403/00873617

[8] A. Benedetti, L. Pelà, A. Aprile, Masonry properties determination via splitting tests on cores with a rotated mortar layer, Proceedings of 8th International Seminar on Structural Masonry (ISSM 08), Istanbul, 5-7 November 2008, 647-655.

[9] C. Mazzotti, B. Ferracuti, A. Bellini, E. Franzoni, E. Sassoni, Strengthening of masonry elements by FRP: Influence of brick mechanical and microstructural properties, Key Engineering Materials (submitted).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.624.330

[10] M. Drdàcký, D. Makšìn, M.D. Mekonone, Z. Slìžkovà, Compression tests on non-standard historic mortar specimens, Proceedings of HMC08 Historic Mortar Conference – Characterization, Diagnosis, Conservation, Repair and Compatibility, Lisbon, 24-26 September 2008, (2008).

[11] M. Drdàcký, Non-Standard Testing of Mechanical Characteristics of Historic Mortars, International Journal of Architectural Heritage 5 (2011) 383-394.

DOI: 10.1080/15583051003717788

[12] J. Henzel, S. Karl, Determination of strength of mortar in the joints of masonry by compression tests on small specimens, Darmstadt Concrete 2 (1987) 123-136.

[13] L. Pelà, A. Benedetti, D. Marastoni, 2012, Interpretation of experimental tests on small specimens of historical mortars, Proceedings of 8th International Conference on structural analysis of historical construction, Wroclaw (Poland) 15-17 October (2012).

[14] E. Sassoni, C. Mazzotti, Assessment of masonry mortar compressive strength by double punch test: the influence of mortar porosity, In M. Boriani, R. Gabaglio, D. Gulotta (Eds) Proceedings of Built Heritage 2013 – Monitoring Conservation Management, Milan (Italy) 18-20 November 2013, 996-1002.

[15] European Standard EN 196-1, Methods of testing cement - Part 1: Determination of strength, (2005).