A Comparative Study of the Identification Methods for Tube Hydroforming Process

Temim Zribi; Ali Khalfallah; Hedi Belhadj Salah

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.651-653.169

Paper Titles

Physically Based Criterion for Prediction of Instability under Stretch-Bending of Sheet Metal
p.144

A Comparative Study on the Formability Prediction of Steel Sheets by Anisotropic Models Based on Associated Flow Rule and Non-Associated Flow Rule
p.150

Research of Dynamic Recrystallization Processes in Heat-Resistant Ni-Based Alloy
p.156

Anisotropic Behavior in Plasticity and Ductile Fracture of an Aluminum Alloy
p.163

A Comparative Study of the Identification Methods for Tube Hydroforming Process
p.169

Deformation Characteristics of Advanced High Strength Steel under Cyclic Bending and Reversed Bending
p.175

Curvature Based Forming Limit Prediction of High-Strength Steel Components with Superimposed Stretching and Bending in the Deep Drawing Process
p.181

Lode Parameter Dependence and Quasi-Unilateral Effects in Continuum Damage Mechanics: Models and Applications in Metal Forming
p.187

Forming Limit Diagram Predictions Using a Self-Consistent Crystal Plasticity Model: A Parametric Study
p.193

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vols. 651-653A Comparative Study of the Identification Methods...

A Comparative Study of the Identification Methods for Tube Hydroforming Process

Abstract:

The present paper aims to assess the accuracy of identification methods used in the evaluation of the flow stress relationship of tubular materials for hydroforming applications. Based on experimental data acquired from home designed and manufactured experimental tool and results collected from literature, flow stress parameters are determined using both analytical and inverse identification methods. The obtained results are coped to experimental measurements to validate the proposed approaches. It is shown from the analysis based on the comparative assessment of flow stress inferred from tube bulge test that, inverse parameter identification method is the appropriate methodology that contribute to a more accurate tube hydroforming characterization.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 651-653)

Pages:

169-174

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.651-653.169

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

July 2015

Authors:

Temim Zribi*, Ali Khalfallah, Hedi Belhadj Salah

Keywords:

Analytical Method, Anisotropy, Inverse Identification, Tube Hydroforming

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Dohmann F., Hartl C., Hydroforming – a method to manufacture light weight parts. J. Mater. Process Technol. 60 (1996) 669-676.

DOI: 10.1016/0924-0136(96)02403-x

Google Scholar

[2] Manabe K. et Amino M., Effects of process parameters and material properties on deformation process in tube hydroforming, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 123 (2002) 285–291.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(02)00094-8

Google Scholar

[3] Hwang YM., Wang CW., Flow stress evaluation of zinc copper and carbon steel tubes by hydraulic bulge test considering their anisotropy, J. Mater. Process Technol. 9 (2009) 4423-4428.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.10.033

Google Scholar

[4] Lianfa Y., Cheng G., Determination of stress-strain relationship of tubular material with hydraulic bulge test, Thin-Walled Structures, 46 (2008) 127-134.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2007.08.017

Google Scholar

[5] Bortot, P., Ceretti, E., Giardini, C., The determination of flow stress of tubular material for hydroforming applications, J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 203 (2008) 381-388.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.047

Google Scholar

[6] Koç, M., Altan T., Aue-u-lan, Y., On the characteristics of tubular materials for hydroforming-experimentation and analysis. Int; J. Mach. GTool Manufact. 41 (2001) 761-772.

DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(00)00070-5

Google Scholar

[7] Hwang, Y. M., Lin, Y. K., Altan, T., Evaluation of tubular materials by a hydraulic bulge test, In. J. of Mach. Tools and Manufact. 47 (2007) 343-351.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.03.009

Google Scholar

[8] Fuchizawa S., Narazaki M., Bulge test for determining stress-strain characteristics of thin tubes. In: Advanced Technol. Plast. 4th ICTP (1993) 488-493.

Google Scholar

[9] Zribi T., Khalfallah A., Belhadjsalah H., Experimental characterization and inverse constitutive parameters identification of tubular materials for tube hydroforming process, Mater. Des. 49 (2013) 866-877.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.077

Google Scholar