Wear Behavior of Hardfacing Deposits on 3.5 % Chromium Cast Steel

Article Preview

Abstract:

The objective of this research is to develop the welding procedure for multilayer hardfacing of 3.5 %chromium cast steel and study wear behavior of hardfacing deposits. Austenitic stainless steel and martensitic hardfacing electrodes were selected as buffer and hardfacing, respectively. Four types of welding procedures were investigated, using shielded metal arc welding (SMAW) process. Three different preheatings were applied in this study. Characteristic of the macro, microstructure and worn surface deposits was investigated by optical microscope. The hardfacing deposits were also determined by the dry sand rubber wheel machine according to procedure A of the ASTM G65 standard. The results indicated that the multilayer hardfacing with and without preheating revealed no crack or defect in the Heat Affected Zone (HAZ) and other regions. The wear resistance of hardfacing presented a little difference. The best abrasive wear resistance was obtained from sample without preheating. This was due to the full martensitic microstructure of the hardfacing.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

167-171

Citation:

Online since:

July 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] KenchiReddy KM, Jayadeva CT. The effect of microstructure on 3 body abrasive wear behavior of hardfacing alloys. Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science. 2014; 4(1): 14-23.

DOI: 10.9756/bijiems.4797

Google Scholar

[2] Yamamoto S. Arc welding of specific steels and cast irons. 3th ed. Japan: Shinko Welding Service Co., Ltd.; (2008).

Google Scholar

[3] Adamiak M, Gorka J, Kik T. Comparaison of abrasion resistance of selected constructional materials. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering. 2009; 37(2): 375-80.

Google Scholar

[4] Shafiee A, Nili-Ahmadabadi M, Ghasemi HM, Hossein-Mirzaei E. Wear behavior of a Cr-Mo steel with different microstructures, in comparison with austempered ductile iron (ADI). Int J Mater Form. 2009; 2(1): 237-41.

DOI: 10.1007/s12289-009-0636-0

Google Scholar

[5] Kiran VTB, Krishna M, Natraj JR, Kumar S. Development and characterization of a electrode deposition procedure for crack-free hardfacing of low carbon steel. IACSIT International Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2012; 4(1): 18-25.

DOI: 10.7763/ijet.2012.v4.312

Google Scholar

[6] Balakrishnan M, Balasubramanian V, Reddy GM. Effect of hardfacing consumables on ballistic performance of Q&T steel joints. ScienceDirect. 2013; 9: 249-58.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dt.2013.12.007

Google Scholar

[7] Gualco A, Svoboda HG, Surian ES, De Vedia LA. Effect of welding procedure on wear behaviour of modified martensitic tool steel hardfacing deposit. Material and Design. 2010; 31: 4165-173.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.04.026

Google Scholar