Factors Affecting Contact Pressure Distribution on Bolted Joint Interface

Article Preview

Abstract:

To investigate factors affecting contact interface pressure distribution in bolted joint, a parametric model was established by ANSYS APDL language in this paper. The contact pressure distribution on bolted joint interface was obtained through interpolating and revising contact interface forces. It is observed that the position of peak interface pressure is between the edge of bolt hole and the edge of bolt head. The contact pressure linearly changes with the bolt load while the distribution trend and radius remain unchanged. When the total thickness of clamped members is fixed, the contact pressure distribution varies from concentrated to uniform with the increasing member thickness ratio, and the maximum contact radius is reached while the member thickness is equal. When one clamped member thickness is fixed, increasing the other’s thickness can also reduce the contact pressure concentration, but the effect gradually weakens. Increasing bolt diameter can slightly increase the absolute contact radius but decrease the normalized contact radius. The inclusion of a washer under the nut can slightly promote interface clamping.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

126-133

Citation:

Online since:

May 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] L. Wang, H. Liu, J. Zhang et al. Precision Engineering, Vol. 37 (4)(2013), P817-824.

Google Scholar

[2] K. Shi, L. Song, J. P. Shi. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, Vol. 45(2)(2014), P297-301. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] M. Pau, A. Baldi. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, Vol. 129(1)(2006), P175-185.

Google Scholar

[4] M. B. Marshall, R. Lewis, R. S. Dwyer-Joyce. Strain, Vol. 42(1)(2006), P31-43.

Google Scholar

[5] M. B. Marshall, I. Zainal, R. Lewis. Strain, Vol. 47(2)(2011), P65-78.

Google Scholar

[6] B. H. M. Marcia, H. M. Fernando, N. P. Milanez. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, Vol. 24(2) (2010), P432-437.

Google Scholar

[7] G. Q. Yang, F. Wang, J. Hong et al. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Vol. 46(7)(2012), P50-56. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] N. Wang, B. T. Li, J. Hong et al. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Vol. 46(4)(2012), P132-136. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[9] J. Huang, L. S Guo. International Journal of Design Engineering, Vol. 4(4)(2011), P332-350.

Google Scholar

[10] N. Haidar, S. Obeed, M. Jawad. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, Vol. 25(11)(2011), P2827-2834.

Google Scholar

[11] L. Wang, R. Du, T. Jin et al. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Vol. 47(7)(2013), P62-67. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar