Low-Cycle Fatigue Testing of a Novel Aluminum Alloy Buckling-Restrained Brace

Abstract:

Compared with steel buckling-restrained braces, aluminum alloy BRBs show excellent advantages in structures where severe corrosion effects can be expected. At the same time, in order to avoid the effect of welding discussed in the previous research, a novel Aluminum alloy Bamboo-shaped Buckling-Restrained Brace (AL-BBRB) consisting of a bamboo-shaped inner core and an outer hollow circular tube was proposed and tested herein. Parametric studies with design variables including cross-sectional sizes of slubs and length of segments were conducted. A series of low-cycle fatigue tests, containing 4 specimens, were performed to address the low-cycle fatigue behavior of AL-BBRB specimens. According to test results of all specimens, stable hysteretic curves were obtained without any local and overall buckling. Consequently, the hysteretic behavior of AL-BBRB specimens is highly concerned with the design variables. Besides, failure positions of AL-BBRB specimens often concentrates on the end of the segment, which can be exactly predicted. Based on test results of all specimens, AL-BBRB specimens show a promising future for wide application in new or retrofitted buildings/bridges where lack the excellent seismic behavior and durability.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 710)
• Pages: 345-350
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.710.345
• Online since: September 2016
• Authors: Ye Liu, Li Zhou, Chun Lin Wang*
• Keywords: Aluminium Alloys, Bamboo-Shaped, Buckling-Restrained Braces, Low-Cycle-Fatigue (LCF)

References

[1] Iwata M, Murai M. Buckling-restrained brace using steel mortar planks; performance evaluation as a hysteretic damper [J]. Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 2006, 35(14): 1807-1826.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.608

[2] Bosco M, Marino E M. Design method and behavior factor for steel frames with buckling restrained braces [J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2013, 42(8): 1243-1263.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2269

[3] Xie Q, Zhou Z, Huang J H, et al. Influence of tube length tolerance on seismic responses of multi-storey buildings with dual-tube self-centering buckling-restrained braces [J]. Engineering Structures, 2016, 116: 26-39.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.023

[4] Carden, L. P., Itani, A. M., & Buckle, I. G. Seismic performance of steel girder bridges with ductile cross frames using buckling-restrained braces. Journal of Structural Engineering (New York, N.Y. ), 2006, 132(3), 338-345.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2006)132:3(338)

[5] Lanning J, Benzoni G, Uang C M. Using Buckling-Restrained Braces on Long-Span Bridges. I: Full-Scale Testing and Design Implications [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2016: 04016001.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0000781

[6] Lanning J, Benzoni G, Uang C M. Using buckling-restrained braces on long-span bridges. II: Feasibility and development of a near-fault loading protocol [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2016: 04016002.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0000804

[7] Usami T, Wang C L, Funayama J. Developing high‐performance aluminum alloy buckling‐restrained braces based on series of low‐cycle fatigue tests [J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2012, 41(4): 643-661.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.1149

[8] Wang C L, Usami T, Funayama J, et al. Low-cycle fatigue testing of extruded aluminum alloy buckling-restrained braces[J]. Engineering Structures, 2013, 46: 294-301.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.07.016

[9] Singh V P, Rai D C. Aluminum buckling restrained braces for seismic resistance of truss moment frames. Tenth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering, July 21-25, 2014, Anchorage, Alaska.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.3780