Experimental Study of the Effects of Geometry and Strain Rate on Dynamic Behavior of Axial Crushing Honeycomb

Abstract:

The axial crushing behavior of some metal honeycombs, of which materials show different characteristics including the strain rate sensitivity with each other, was studied with varying the branch angle at the node of honeycomb, and the effects of geometry and strain rate on that as an energy absorber were discussed. Honeycomb specimens of different branch angles were made by the corrugation technique, and axial crushing tests were carried out under low-speed and impact loading conditions. Then, the effects of the characteristics of stress – strain relation of the material itself, the branch angle and the strain rate on the stress – strain relation of honeycomb structure and the mean buckling stress were examined. The tendency of deterioration in the plateau load or the mean buckling stress due to the irregularity of branch angle was evaluated with considering the influence of boundary conditions by the aid with the numerical simulation. It was also found that the strain rate dependence of metal honeycomb is greatly relaxed as compared with that of the material itself.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 715)
• Pages: 86-92
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.715.86
• Online since: September 2016
• Authors: Tsutomu Umeda*, Kohei Kataoka, Koji Mimura
• Keywords: Cell Geometry, Energy Absorption, Honeycomb, Strain Rate Dependence

References

[1] T. Wierzbicki, Crushing analysis of metal honeycombs, Int. J. Impact Engng. 1-2 (1983) 157-174.

[2] T. Umeda, K. Mimura, S. Hirayama, Effects of geometry and material properties on energy absorption of axially crushing honeycomb structure, Proceedings of ATEM'11. CD-ROM (2011) 10 Pages.

DOI: 10.1299/jsmeatem.2011.10._os09f080-

[3] M. Yamashita, M. Gotoh, Impact behavior of honeycomb structures with various cell specifications — numerical simulation and experiment, Int. J. Impact Engng. 32 (2005) 618-630.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.09.001

[4] Livermore Software Technology Corp. (Ed. ), JSOL Corporation (Tr. ), LS-DYNA Ver. 971 User's Manual, Vols. I&II, JSOL Corporation, Tokyo, (2007).

[5] V. Tvergaard, J.W. Hutchinson, The influence of plasticity on mixed mode interface toughness, J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 41-6 (1993) 1119-1135.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-5096(93)90057-m

[6] Q.D. Yang, M.D. Thouless, Mixed-mode fracture analyses of plastically-deforming adhesive joints, International Journal of Fracture. 110 (2001) 175-187.

[7] T. Umeda, K. Mimura, T. Kamigawa, Numerical evaluation of dynamic behavior of axial crushing honeycomb based on adhesively-bonded model, Applied Mechanics and Materials. 566 (2014) 605-610.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.566.605