Determining Anisotropic Young’s Modulus of Ceramic Coatings by the Relative Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

Young’s moduli of coatings in the both perpendicular and horizontal directions were evaluated by the relative method, which are determined via establishing the relationship between the uncoated specimen and the coated specimen, with different coating positions during the loading tests. Compared with other traditional methods, the relative method is much simpler in both sample pretreatment and testing device. The validity and reliability of this method has been demonstrated by the beam specimens with CVD-SiC coatings, which will be applied to establish and improve a simple and reliable evaluation system for the anisotropy of coating modulus.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

100-104

Citation:

Online since:

January 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] V.K. Tolpygo, D.R. Clarke, Rumpling induced by thermal cycling of an overlay coating: the effect of coating thickness, Acta Mater., 5 (2004) 615-621.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2003.10.001

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Liu, T. Nakamura, V. Srinivasan, et al, Non-linear elastic properties of plasma-sprayed zirconia coatings and associated relationships with processing conditions, Acta Mater., 55 (2007) 4667-4678.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.04.037

Google Scholar

[3] Y. Adraider, Y.X. Pang, F. Nabhani, et al, Deposition of alumina coatings on stainless steel by a combined laser/sol–gel technique, Mater. Lett., 91 (2013) 88-91.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2012.09.082

Google Scholar

[4] S. Ma, H. Huang, M.Y. Lu, et al, A simple resonant method that can simultaneously measure elastic modulus and density of thin films, Surf. Coat. Technol., 209 (2012) 208-238.

DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.08.072

Google Scholar

[5] Y.W. Bao, Y.C. Zhou, X.X. Bu, et al, Evaluating elastic modulus and strength of hard coatings by relative method, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 458 (2007) 268-274.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.131

Google Scholar

[6] B.K. Jang, H. Matsubara, Influence of porosity on hardness and Young's modulus of nanoporous EB-PVD TBCs by nanoindentation, Mater. Lett., 59 (2005) 3462-3466.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2005.06.014

Google Scholar

[7] Z. Liu, Y.W. Bao, D.T. Wan, et al, A Novel Method to Evaluate Young's Modulus of Ceramics at High Temperature up to 2100 °C, Ceram. Int., 41 (2015) 12835-12840.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.06.120

Google Scholar

[8] Standard test method for Young's modulus, Tangent modulus, and Chord modulus, E111 – 04, ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, (2010).

DOI: 10.1520/e0111-04

Google Scholar

[9] J. Tan, P.J. Meadows, D. Zhang, et al, Young's modulus measurements of SiC coatings on spherical particles by using nanoindentation, J. Nucl. Mater., 393 (2009) 22-29.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.05.001

Google Scholar

[10] Y. Kajikawa, S. Noda, H. Komiyama, Preferred orientation of chemical vapor deposited polycrystalline silicon carbide films, Chem. Vapor Deposit, 8 (2002) 99-104.

DOI: 10.1002/1521-3862(20020503)8:3<99::aid-cvde99>3.0.co;2-c

Google Scholar