Water Absorption and Hydration Products of Metakaolin Modified Mortar

Article Preview

Abstract:

The compressive strength, water absorption and hydration products of mortar with metakaolin addition were characterized by a range of techniques to evaluate the effect of metakaolin on the properties and hydration of mortar. Metakaolin is more effective on the improvement of compressive strength of mortar after curing for 7 days, due to the refinement of pore structure and pozzolanic reaction between metakaolin and calcium hydroxide. Water absorption of mortar was reduced by introducing metakaolin, especially in the very early age, due to the optimization of packing density of mortar by superfine metakaolin particles. There is no correlation between compressive strength and water absorption of mortar due to the differences between mechanisms affecting the compressive strength and water absorption of mortar by metakaolin. The hydration products of mortar without metakaolin were Portlandite and ettringite. Additional hemicarboaluminate and monocarboaluminate were identified in mortar with metakaolin addition. Metakaolin addition reduced the calcium hydroxide content due to the pozzolanic reaction.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

505-509

Citation:

Online since:

January 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] C. He, B. Osbaeck, E. Makovicky, Cement and Concrete Research, 25 (1995) 1691-1702.

DOI: 10.1016/0008-8846(95)00165-4

Google Scholar

[2] M. Frias, O.R. Largo, R. Garcia Jimenez, I. Vegas, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 91 (2008) 4044-4051.

Google Scholar

[3] R. Fernandez, F. Martirena, K.L. Scrivener, Cement and Concrete Research, 41 (2011) 113-122.

Google Scholar

[4] N.J. Coleman, W.R. McWhinnie, Journal of Materials Science, 35 (2000) 2701-2710.

Google Scholar

[5] Z. Shui, T. Sun, Z. Fu, G. Wang, J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. Mater. Sci. Ed., 25 (2010) 849-852.

DOI: 10.1007/s11595-010-0106-z

Google Scholar

[6] F. Cassagnabere, M. Mouret, G. Escadeillas, Cement and Concrete Research, 39 (2009) 1164-1173.

Google Scholar

[7] Q. Li, H. Geng, Y. Huang, Z. Shui, Construction and Building Materials, 101, Part 1 (2015) 184-192.

Google Scholar

[8] M. Antoni, J. Rossen, F. Martirena, K. Scrivener, Cement and Concrete Research, 42 (2012) 1579-1589.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.09.006

Google Scholar

[9] E. Aggelakopoulou, A. Bakolas, A. Moropoulou, Applied Clay Science, 53 (2011) 15-19.

Google Scholar

[10] M. Frias, J. Cabrera, Cement and Concrete Research, 31 (2001) 519-527.

Google Scholar

[11] M. Frias, R. Vigil de la Villa, M.I. Sanchez de Rojas, C. Medina, A. Juan Valdes, Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 95 (2012) 386-391.

Google Scholar

[12] P. Duan, Z. Shui, W. Chen, C. Shen, Construction and Building Materials, 36 (2012) 947-953.

Google Scholar