Validation of the Splitting Tensile Strength Formula for Concrete Containing Blast Furnace Slag

Article Preview

Abstract:

The adverse environmental impact of the construction industry may be mitigated through the partial replacement of cement with supplementary cementitious materials (SCM). SCMs such as ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), impart many favourable fresh and long-term concrete properties. A study by Mohamed [1] assessed the splitting tensile strength of sustainable self- consolidating concrete in which up to 80% of the cement was partially replaced with ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), and developed a prediction formula for the splitting tensile strength. In this paper, the tensile strength prediction formula developed by Mohamed et al. [1] is benchmarked against formulas proposed in different building codes and validated with additional test results obtained from the literature. The proposed prediction formula showed excellent correlation to experimental data obtained from the literature.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

136-140

Citation:

Online since:

July 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] O. A. Mohamed, O. F. Najm, Splitting Tensile Strength of Self-Consolidating Concrete Containing Slag, Proceedings: Toronto'2016 AES-ATEMA International Conference Advanced and Trends in Engineering Materials and their Applications, (2016).

Google Scholar

[2] ACI-233R. - Ground granulated blast-furnace slag as a cementitious constituent in concrete, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, (1995).

DOI: 10.14359/1125

Google Scholar

[3] S. Rafat, B. Rachid, Use of iron and steel industry by-product (GGBS) in cement paste and mortar. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, (2012), pp.29-34.

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.09.002

Google Scholar

[4] BS-1881: 105 (1984). Testing Concrete Part 105. Method for determination of flow. British Standards Institution.

Google Scholar

[5] BS-1881: 116 (1983). Testing concrete Part 116. Method for determination of compressive strength of concrete cubes. British Standards Institution.

Google Scholar

[6] BS-1881: 117 (1983). Testing concrete Part 117. Method for determination of tensile splitting strength. London: British Standards Institution.

Google Scholar

[7] A. F. Bingol, I. Tohumcu, Effects of different curing regimes on the compressive strength properties of self-compacting concrete incorporating fly ash and silica fume, Mater. Des. 51 (2013) 12–18.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.106

Google Scholar

[8] M. A. Mansur, M. M. Islam, Interpretation of concrete strength for nonstandard specimens. J. Mater. Civil Eng. 14(2) (2002) 151-155.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2002)14:2(151)

Google Scholar

[9] O. Boukendakdi, S. Kenai, E. H. Kadri, F. Rouis, Effect of slag on the rheology of fresh self-compacted concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 23 (2009) 2593–2598.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.029

Google Scholar

[10] N. Arioglu, Z. C. Girgin, E. Arioglu Evaluation of ratio between splitting tensile strength and compressive strength for concretes up to 120 MPa and its application in strength criterion. ACI Mater. J. 103 (2006) 18-24.

DOI: 10.14359/15123

Google Scholar

[11] O. A. Mohamed, Z. I. Syed, O. F. Najm, Splitting tensile strength of sustainable self-consolidating concrete. International Conference on Sustainable Design, Engineering and Construction 145 (2016) 1218-1225.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.157

Google Scholar

[12] J. Kishan, To effect on strength properties of concrete of by using GGBS by Partial Replacing cement and addition of GGBS without replacing cement, SSRG Int. J. Civil Eng. 3 (2016) 144-149.

DOI: 10.21275/v5i2.25021601

Google Scholar