Modelling of Closed Steel Supports for Underground and Mining Works

Article Preview

Abstract:

The closed steel supports of different shapes are used in mining and underground constructions. The yielding and unyielding supports are prefabricated from rolled, usually robust steel profiles. The load carrying capacity of the support is considerably influenced by the active loading and passive forces. The passive forces are induced by the interactions of support with the surrounding rock massif [1]. The user-friendly software was processed for the operational determination of load carrying capacity. The analysis has three parts: the first part consists of the structural geometry processing. The second part includes the numerical solution of statically indeterminate structure for the specified load. The third part is the calculation of load carrying capacity, components of internal forces and deformations. The force method and the numerical integration were used for solution. The Winkler model is applied when the support is in interaction with the surrounding environment. The load carrying capacity of support is limited by the slip resistance of the connected parts and reaching the ultimate state of the profile. The plasticity calculation is performed in accordance with EN 1993-1-1 Ed. 2. The limit values beyond the scope of this standard can be selected for an alternative computation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

313-316

Citation:

Online since:

September 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] L. Koubova, P. Janas and M. Krejsa: Nonlinear solution of steel arch supports. Key Engineering Materials, 2016, Vol. 713, pp.119-122. DOI: 10. 4028/www. scientific. net/KEM. 713. 119.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.713.119

Google Scholar

[2] P. Janas and L. Koubova: The modelling and experimental verification of the properties and loading capacity of the steel arch reinforcement. Proceedings of international conference Modelling in Mechanics, Ostrava, Czech Republic (2013).

Google Scholar

[3] P. Janas, I. Kolos and R. Fojtik: Classification of steel mine support sections as per EC3 classification. Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 969 (2014) 63-66, DOI: 10. 4028/www. scientific. net/AMR. 969. 63.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.969.63

Google Scholar

[4] P. Janas, L. Koubova and M. Krejsa: Load carrying capacity of steel arch reinforcement taking into account the geometrical and physical nonlinearity. Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 821 (2016).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.821.709

Google Scholar

[5] L. Randyskova and P. Janas: Non-Linear Solution of Steel Arc Reinforcement with Influence of Passive Forces. Transactions of the VŠB - Technical University of Ostrava, Civil Engineering Series, Vol. 11, Issue 1 (2011).

DOI: 10.2478/v10160-011-0012-0

Google Scholar

[6] CSN EN 1993-1-1 ed. 2 (731401), Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures - Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings, Czech Standards Institute (2011).

Google Scholar

[7] R. Fuentes: Internal forces of underground structures from observed displacements. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 49 (2015) 50-66, DOI: 10. 1016/j. tust. 2015. 03. 002.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2015.03.002

Google Scholar

[8] S. K. Sharan, Finite element analysis of infinite solids using elastic supports. Computers & Structures, Vol. 53, Issue 5 (1994) 1145-1152, DOI: 10. 1016/0045-7949(94)90162-7.

DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(94)90162-7

Google Scholar