Dual Boundary Element Model of 3D Piezoelectric Smart Structures

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, the application of the dual boundary element method (DBEM) in the field of structural health monitoring (SHM) is explored. The model involves a 3D host structure, which is formulated by the DBEM in the Laplace domain, and 3D piezoelectric transducers, whose finite element model is derived from the electro-mechanical behaviour of piezoelectricity. The piezoelectric transducers and the host structure are coupled together via BEM variables. The practicability of this method in active sensing applications is demonstrated through comparisons with established FEM and parametric studies.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

363-366

Citation:

Online since:

September 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Wen, P., M. Aliabadi, and D. Rooke, Cracks in three dimensions: A dynamic dual boundary element analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1998. 167(1): pp.139-151.

DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7825(98)00116-9

Google Scholar

[2] Zou, F. and M. Aliabadi, A boundary element method for detection of damages and self-diagnosis of transducers using electro-mechanical impedance. Smart Mat and Struct, 2015. 24(9): p.095015.

DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/24/9/095015

Google Scholar

[3] Benedetti, I. and M. Aliabadi, A fast hierarchical dual boundary element method for three‐dimensional elastodynamic crack problems. International journal for numerical methods in engineering, 2010. 84(9): pp.1038-1067.

DOI: 10.1002/nme.2929

Google Scholar

[4] Benedetti, I., M. Aliabadi, and A. Milazzo, A fast BEM for the analysis of damaged structures with bonded piezoelectric sensors. Comp Meth in Appl Mech and Eng, 2010. 199(9): pp.490-501.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2009.09.007

Google Scholar

[5] Fedelinski, P, Aliabadi M.H. and Roooke D.P. The Laplace transform DBEM for mixed-mode crack analysis, Computers and Structures, 59, 1021-1031, (1996).

DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(95)00347-9

Google Scholar