Influence of Guar Gum Derivatives on Hardened Properties of Aerial Lime-Based Mortars

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper studies the possibility of usage of the guar gum and its derivatives (carboxymethylhydroxypropyl guar (CMHPG) and hydroxypropyl guar (HPG)) as admixtures for aerial lime-based mortars. The influence on the properties of mortars was studied on the aerial lime –based mortars prepared with quartz fine grained sand and doses of admixtures ranging between 0,5 and 10‰. The hardened bulk densities, flexural and compressive strength, porosity, water absorption coefficient due to capillarity action and carbonation rate were studied. The addition of the hydroxypropyl guar lowered the bulk density (due to an air intake), improved workability, slightly increased the strength, slowed carbonation rate, and nobbled the water transport in the mortar. The addition of carboxymethylhydroxypropyl guar does not impact the bulk density, the strengths were increased similarly to HPG: it does not impact carbonation rate significantly, so the long term strengths were comparative with the HPG. The water transport was slightly better in lower doses and slightly worse in larger doses in comparison with the reference mortar. The pure guaran was found not to be beneficial for the lime mortars for its only advantage is in the water transport, where in any dose the transport was better than any other mortar, but the benefit of this is questionable.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

22-29

Citation:

Online since:

January 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Moroupolou, A.S. Cakmak, G. Biscontin, A. Bakolas and E. Zendri, Advanced Byzantine cement based composites resisting earthquakestresses: the crushed brick/lime mortars of Justinian's Hagia Sophia, Constructionand Building Materials. 16(8) (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/s0950-0618(02)00005-3

Google Scholar

[2] C. Rodriguez-Navarro, E. Ruiz-Agudo, E. Ortega-Huertas, E. Hansen, Nanostructure and irreversible colloidal behavior of Ca(OH)2: implications incultural heritage conservation. Langmuir 21 (2005) p.10948–10957.

DOI: 10.1021/la051338f

Google Scholar

[3] NK. Singh, PC. Mishra, VK. Singh, KK. Narang, Effects of hydroxyethyl celluloseand oxalic acid on the properties of cement. Cement Concrete Research 33 (2003) p.1319–1329.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(03)00060-7

Google Scholar

[4] V. Medić, Influence of Hydroxypropyl Guar on Water Retention of Cement Based Renders. Bulletin of the Chemists and Technologists of Bosnia and Herzegovina 40 (2013) pp.57-60.

Google Scholar

[5] A. Govin, M-C. Berholin, B. Biasotti, M. Giudicci, V. Langella et al., Effect of Guar Gum Derivatives on Fresh State Properties of Portland Cement-Based Mortars. in J. Sanjayan; K. Sagoe-Crentsil (Eds) Concrete 2015 / RILEM Week - 27th Biennial National Conference of the Concrete Institute of Australia in conjunction with the 69th RILEM Week, The Concrete Institute of Australia, Melbourne 2015, p.848.

DOI: 10.14359/51688106

Google Scholar

[6] M. Lasheras-Zubiate, I. Navarro-Blasco, J.M. Fernández a J.I. Álvarez. Effect of the addition of chitosan ethers on the fresh state properties of cement mortars. Cement and Concrete Composites, 34(8) (2012), pp.964-973.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.04.010

Google Scholar

[7] Y.V. Ustinova, T.P. Nikiforova. Cement Compositions with the Chitosan Additive. Procedia Engineering. 153 (2016), pp.810-815.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.247

Google Scholar

[8] T. Poinot, A. Govin a P Grosseau. Influence of hydroxypropylguars on rheological behavior of cement-based mortars. Cement and Concrete Research. 58 (2014), pp.161-168.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.01.020

Google Scholar

[9] M.P. Seabra, H. Paiva, J.A. Labrincha, V.M. Ferreira. Admixtures effect on fresh state properties of aerial lime based mortars. Construction and Building Materials. 23(2) (2009), pp.1147-1153.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.06.008

Google Scholar

[10] A. Izaguirre, J. Lanas, J.I. Álvarez. Characterization of aerial lime-based mortars modified by the addition of two different water-retaining agents. Cement and Concrete Composites, 33(2) (2011), pp.309-318.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.09.008

Google Scholar

[11] EN 459-1: Building lime – Part 1: Definitions, specifications and conformity criteria (2015).

Google Scholar

[12] EN 1015 – 6 Methods of test for mortar for masonry - Part 6: Determination of bulk density of fresh mortar (1999).

DOI: 10.3403/01541488u

Google Scholar

[13] EN 1015 – 11 Methods of test for mortar for masonry - Part 11: Determination of flexural and compressive strength of hardened mortar (2000).

DOI: 10.3403/01905442u

Google Scholar

[14] EN 13755 Natural stone test methods - Determination of water absorption at atmospheric pressure (2009).

Google Scholar

[15] EN 1015 – 18 Methods of test for mortar for masonry - Part 18: Determination of water absorption coefficient due to capillarity action of hardened mortar (2003).

DOI: 10.3403/02720093

Google Scholar

[16] EN 1015 – 3 Methods of test for mortar for masonry - Part 3: Determination of consistence of fresh mortar (by flow table) (2000).

DOI: 10.3403/01541440

Google Scholar

[17] Hoa Lam. Effects of Internal Curing Methods on Restrained Shrinkage and Permeability SN2620. Skokie, IL: Portland Cement Association; (2005).

Google Scholar

[18] A. Izaguirre, J. Lanas, J.I. Álvarez. Ageing of lime mortars with admixture: Durability and strength assessment. Cement and Concrete Research, 40(7) (2010), pp.1081-1095.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.02.013

Google Scholar

[19] M. Arandigoyen, J.L. Pérez Bernal, M.A. Bello López, J.I. Álvarez. Lime-pastes with different kneading water: Pore structure and capillary porosity. Applied Surface Science, 252(5) (2005) pp.1449-1459.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.02.145

Google Scholar

[20] H. Paiva, L.P. Esteves, P.B. Cachim and V.M. Ferreira. Rheology and hardened properties of single-coat render mortars with different types of water retaining agents. Construction and Building Materials, 23(2) (2009), pp.1141-1146.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.06.001

Google Scholar