Study on Two-Step Aging Technology of 6082 Aluminum Bumper

Article Preview

Abstract:

The influence of four parameters of two-step aging on the mechanical properties of 6082 aluminum alloy bumper was studied by orthogonal test. The results show that compared with the single stage aging, the two-step aging process can reduce the aging time and improve the production efficiency under the premise of the mechanical properties of the bumper meet the requirements. Among the four aging process parameters, the second stage aging temperature and holding time are the main factors that affect the final results, while the first stage aging temperature and holding time are secondary factors. The most suitable aging process parameters for the 6082 aluminum alloy bumper is (150 °C, 2 h) + (190 °C, 2.5 h). After two-step aging, the grain of the aluminum bumper is small and evenly distributed, leading to good mechanical properties. The generalized experiment shows that the application of the two-step aging process still has some limitations and needs to be further optimized and perfected.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

245-251

Citation:

Online since:

February 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H. Zheng, X.Y. Zhao, Lightweight automobile and application of aluminum alloys in modern automobile production, J. Forging and Stamping Technology. 2 (2016) 1-6.

Google Scholar

[2] Z.G. Zhu, The application of aluminum alloy composites in lightweight automotive, J. Journal of Light Metals. 10 (2011) 3-6.

Google Scholar

[3] Y.Q. Chen, F. Mo, Y. N. Peng, The development trend and lightweight of new energy vehicles, J. Science and Technology Innovation Herald. 13.12 (2016) 41-45.

Google Scholar

[4] X.D. Liu, Effect of heat treatment technology on mechanical properties of 6082 aluminum alloy profile and rod, J. Light Alloy Fabrication Technology. 39.8 (2011) 61-64.

Google Scholar

[5] R.F. Liao, Study on the optimization of heat treatment of production of 6082 aluminum profiles, D. Central South University. (2013).

Google Scholar

[6] L. Shi, Y.J. Wang, H. X. Wu, Research on heat treatment process of 6082 aluminum alloy profile for car body, J. Heat Treatment Technology and Equipment. 37.6 (2016) 32-34.

Google Scholar

[7] G.M. Nowotnik, J. Sieniawski, A. Nowotnik, Effect of heat treatment on tensile and fracture toughness properties of 6082 alloy, J. Journal of Achievements in Materials & Manufacturing Engineering. 32.2 (2009).

Google Scholar

[8] B. Podder, C. Mondal, G. Gopi, Effects of heat treatment on the tensile properties of flow-formed AA6082 Aluminum Alloy Tube, C. Materials Science Forum. (2015) 131-134.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.830-831.131

Google Scholar

[9] L.L. Yang, M. Jin, C.F. Xia, Y.C. Wang, Effect of Cu addition on the two-step aging in 6082 Al-Mg-Si alloy, J. Shanghai Metals. 32.5 (2010) 39-42.

Google Scholar

[10] N. Shen, J.X. He, C.L. Li, Effect of two-stage aging on performance of 6082 profiles, J. Hot Working Technology. 43.18 (2014) 166-168.

Google Scholar

[11] C.D. Marioara, S.J. Andersen, J. Jansen, et al, Atomic model for GP-zones in a 6082 Al–Mg–Si system, J. Acta Materialia. 49.2 (2001) 321-328.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6454(00)00302-5

Google Scholar

[12] C.D. Marioara, S.J. Andersen, J. Jansen, et al, The influence of temperature and storage time at RT on nucleation of the β" phase in a 6082 Al-Mg-Si alloy, J. Acta Materialia. 51.3 (2003) 789-796.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6454(02)00470-6

Google Scholar

[13] M. Vedani, G. Angella, P. Bassani, et al. DSC analysis of strengthening precipitates in ultrafine Al-Mg-Si alloys, J. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 87.1 (2007) 277-284.

DOI: 10.1007/s10973-006-7837-2

Google Scholar