Paper Titles
Contribution of Sisal Reinforced Plaster in out of Plane Resistance of Masonry Column
p.343
Effect of Fibre Content on Splitting-Tensile Strength of Wheat Straw Reinforced Concrete for Pavement Applications
p.349
Compressive Behavior of Circular Concrete Columns Confined by Basalt Fiber Reinforced Polymer (BFRP)
p.355
Application of Redundancy to Steel Box Tied Arch Bridge Structural System
p.361
Strength and Durability of High Performance Concrete Doped New Low Clinker Cementing Material
p.370
Seismic Fragility Assessment of Building with Metallic Hysteretic Damper in Consideration of Stiffness Ratio
p.377
Examining the Effect of Asphalt Plant Surplus Filler on Water and Chloride Ion Permeability of Cement Mortar
p.383
Pushover Analysis of Precast Segmental UHPFRC Bridge Columns with Unbonded Posttensioned Tendons
p.391
Preliminary Study of Sinabung Volcanic Ash Usage in the Making of Paving Block Type C and D
p.397

Seismic Fragility Assessment of Building with Metallic Hysteretic Damper in Consideration of Stiffness Ratio

Article Preview

Abstract:

The application of hysteretic steel damper for seismic protection and rehabilitation has been recognized efficient and cost effective method in reducing structural responses under seismic events. The damper absorbs seismic energy through its hysteretic behaviour. This study aims to assess the vulnerability of building strengthened with hysteretic steel damper considering variability of stiffness ratio parameter in hysteretic steel damper for the application in six-story steel building. Probabilistic Seismic Demand Model (PSDM) for the structural model is developed by using nonlinear dynamic analysis under 30 ground motions. Furthermore, fragility curves are constructed based on inter-story drift and spectrum acceleration. Finally, the performance of the steel structure with and without hysteretic steel damper in addition to optimal stiffness ratio is presented and compared.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Advanced Materials Research VIII View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 765)

Pages:

377-382

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.765.377

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

March 2018

Authors:

Daniel Rumbi Teruna*, Hendrik Wijaya

Keywords:

Hysteretic Damper, Seismic Fragility, Steel Building, Vulnerability Assessment

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Tena-Colunga, Arturo, and Héctor Hernández-Ramírez. code-Oriented global Design Parameters for Moment-resisting steel Frames with Metallic structural Fuses., Frontiers in Built Environment 3 (2017): 19.

DOI: 10.3389/fbuil.2017.00019

Google Scholar

[2] Bayat, Mahmoud, and G. R. Abdollahzade. Analysis of the steel braced frames equipped with ADAS devices under the far field records., Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures 8.2 (2011): 163-181.

DOI: 10.1590/s1679-78252011000200004

Google Scholar

[3] Di Cesare, Antonio, Felice Carlo Ponzo, and Domenico Nigro. Assessment of the performance of hysteretic energy dissipation bracing systems., Bulletin of earthquake engineering 12.6 (2014): 2777-2796.

DOI: 10.1007/s10518-014-9623-z

Google Scholar

[4] Rajeev, P., and S. Tesfamariam. Seismic fragilities for reinforced concrete buildings with consideration of irregularities., Structural Safety 39 (2012): 1-13.

DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2012.06.001

Google Scholar

[5] Rajeev, Pathmanathan, and Solomon Tesfamariam. Effects of vertical irregularities and construction quality in seismic fragilities for reinforced concrete buildings., International Journal of Earthquake and Impact Engineering 2.1 (2017): 1-31.

DOI: 10.1504/ijeie.2017.10004344

Google Scholar

[6] Xia, Chuan, and Robert D. Hanson. Influence of ADAS element parameters on building seismic response., Journal of Structural Engineering 118.7 (1992): 1903-(1918).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1992)118:7(1903)

Google Scholar

[7] Teruna, Daniel R., Taksiah A. Majid, and Bambang Budiono. Experimental study of hysteretic steel damper for energy dissipation capacity., Advances in Civil Engineering 2015 (2015).

DOI: 10.1155/2015/631726

Google Scholar

[8] McKenna, Frank, G. L. Fenves, and M. H. Scott. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation., University of California, Berkeley, CA (2000).

Google Scholar

[9] Ambraseys, N., et al. Internet site for European strong-motion data., Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata 45.3 (2004): 113-129.

Google Scholar

[10] Rajeev, P. Vector-valued intensity measures in probabilistic seismic risk assessment., Individual study report. Italy: ROSE School, University of Pavia(2007).

Google Scholar

[11] Cornell, C. Allin, et al. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines., Journal of structural engineering 128.4 (2002): 526-533.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526)

Google Scholar

[12] Jalayer, F., P. Franchin, and P. E. Pinto. A scalar damage measure for seismic reliability analysis of RC frames., Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 36.13 (2007): 2059-(2079).

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.704

Google Scholar

[13] FEMA, P. Commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings., FEMA-356, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.

Google Scholar