Microstructure and Local Mechanical Properties of Skutterudites with Addition of Metallic Borides

Article Preview

Abstract:

Skutterudites are an important class of thermoelectric p- and n-type materials and they have already achieved fair efficiencies for the conversion of heat to electricity. Nevertheless researchers try to further enhance the figure of merit, ZT, by various ways. In this work we study microstructure and mechanical properties of two thermoelectric materials: an industrial n-type (Mm,Sm)yCo4Sb12 skutterudite and an industrial p-type DDyFe3CoSb12 skutterudite, both mixed with 1 wt.% of Ta0.8Zr0.2B. Thin lamellae were prepared from the compacted materials using a focused ion beam. Analytical transmission electron microscopy was used on lamellae to study details of microstructure. A fine dispersion of precipitates was found both at nanograin boundaries and in their interiors. Quasistatic and dynamic nanoindentation tests were carried out on planar polished sections in the range of applied loads from 0.01 to 10 mN. The results were complemented with quantitative modulus mapping of local mechanical properties with 10-nm resolution.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

9-14

Citation:

Online since:

October 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H.J. Goldsmid, Introduction to Thermoelectricity, Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, (2010).

Google Scholar

[2] K. Koumoto and T. Mori (Eds.), Thermoelectric Nanomaterials, Materials Design and Applications, Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, (2013).

Google Scholar

[3] G. Rogl and P. Rogl, Sci. Adv. Mater 3 (2011) 517-538.

Google Scholar

[4] L. Zhang, G. Rogl, A. Grytsiv, S. Puchegger, J. Koppensteiner, F. Spieckermann, H. Kabelka, M. Reinecker, P. Rogl, W. Schranz, M. Zehetbauer, M.A. Carpenter, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 170 (2010) 26-31.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mseb.2010.02.022

Google Scholar

[5] G. Rogl and P. Rogl, Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry 4 (2017) 50-57.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsc.2017.02.006

Google Scholar

[6] G. Rogl, A. Grytsiv, F. Failamani, M. Hochenhofer, E. Bauer and P. Rogl, J. Alloys Compd. 695 (2017) 682-696.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.114

Google Scholar

[7] G. Rogl and P. Rogl, Materials Today Physics 3 (2017) 48-69.

Google Scholar

[8] G. Rogl, J. Bursik, A. Grytsiv, S. Puchegger, V. Soprunyuk, W. Schranz, X. Yan, E. Bauer, P. Rogl, Acta Mater. 145 (2018) 359-368.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.12.001

Google Scholar

[9] W.C. Oliver, G.M. Pharr, J. Mater. Res. 19 (2004) 3-20.

Google Scholar

[10] I. Zlotnikov, E. Zolotoyabko, P. Fratzl, Progress in Materials Science 87 (2017) 292–320.

Google Scholar

[11] K.L. Johnson, Contact mechanics. Cambridge University Press, (1985).

Google Scholar