The Mature Formation Production Features

Vadim Aleksandrov; Marsel Kadyrov; Andrey Ponomarev; Vadim Golozubenko; Vladimir Kopyrin

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.785.133

Paper Titles

Detailed Approach to Planning Transfers from One Production Facility to Another
p.101

Microseismic Multistage Formation Hydraulic Fracturing (MFHF) Monitoring Analysis Results
p.107

Oil and Gas Reef Facies Reservoir 3D Geological Modeling
p.118

Assessment of Radial Drilling Feasibility at the Fields of the Orenburg Region
p.125

The Mature Formation Production Features
p.133

Genetic Zoning of the YUV₁ Productive Horizon Deposits within the Tagrinsko-Yarainersky Bar
p.140

Selecting a Technology to Increase well Capacity and Enhance Oil Recovery of the YUS₁¹ Formation of the Fainsk Oil Field
p.146

Efficiency Analysis of Processing Injection Wells with Acid Compositions
p.153

Use of Diverter Compositions for Enhancing the Effectiveness of Oil Recovery from Productive Deposits
p.159

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 785The Mature Formation Production Features

The Mature Formation Production Features

Abstract:

The mature stage of field production is reported to observe a significant decline in oil production rates; watercut either grows slowly or (with the regulation of the production processes) somewhat stabilizes. In some periods, it even somewhat decreases, usually due to the cut-off of the highly watered well stock. During the multi-foundation field production, joint exploitation of the productive foundation is often applied; these foundations are often allocated to different sites. The research objective is to justify the directions for further production of the geological and commercial site, which is at the mature production stage; choose the most technologically "productive" and economically feasible interventions in order to increase oil recovery. Applying the classical methods of geological-field analysis and calculation of displacement characteristics, the main trends in the field production have been revealed; using the data of field and geophysical research, the reasons for obtaining unsatisfactory results in joint foundation operation have been revealed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 785)

Pages:

133-139

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.785.133

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2018

Authors:

Vadim Aleksandrov, Marsel Kadyrov*, Andrey Ponomarev, Vadim Golozubenko, Vladimir Kopyrin

Keywords:

Foundation, Oil Recovery Factor, Permeability Properties, Porosity Properties, Production Site, Reservoir Units, Suite

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] R.Kh. Muslimov, Oil recovery: Past, Present, Future (Production Optimization, ORF Maximization): Textboo, Fen Press of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan, Kazan, (2014).

Google Scholar

[2] V.D. Lysenko, V.I. Greifer, Rational Development of Oil Fields, Nedra Business Center, Moscow, (2005).

Google Scholar

[3] R.Kh. Muslimov, Yu. A. Volkov, L.G. Karpova, V.V. Tyurin, D.G. Yarakhanova, The Development of Oil Fields with Horizontal Wells: Experience and Achievements, Pluton, Kazan, 2017, 450.

Google Scholar

[4] V.D. Lysenko, The Development of Oil Fields. The Efficient Methods, Nedra Business Center, Moscow, 2009, 552.

Google Scholar

[5] S.N. Zakirov, About the Criterion of the Rational Development of Oil-and-Gas Fields, Oil Industry, 5 (2015), 68-69.

Google Scholar