TEM Study of Junctions between Martensite Laths and Changes in Microstructure of Low-Carbon Steel before LCF II

Article Preview

Abstract:

The joining points between martensite packets (laths) and their microstructure in low-carbon martensitic steel were TEM studied. In order to determine the real microstructure of the packet, martensite examinations were conducted before low-cycle fatigue (LCF) tests, considering the structure of the packets and types of their joining. The changes in microstructure occurred in the above places after austenite-martensite transformation were also analyzed. It was shown that after jointing some packets initiate arch-like contours in the laths, exhibiting a presence of local stresses. Several types of joints are considered, including the penetration of laths of one packet into that of neighboring one. It was revealed that the microstructure changes are exhibited in joining points without any external deformation, and result in the localized plastic deformation at LCF. It is assumed that microcrack initiation and commencement of fatigue failure of the material should be expected to happen just in these areas. All the above is explained from point of view of the peculiarities of martensitic transformation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

300-305

Citation:

Online since:

December 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M.R. Lin, M.E. Fine , T. Mura, Fatigue crack initiation on slip bands: Theory and experiment, Acta Metallurgica, (1986).Vols. 34, Issue 4, p.619–628.

DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(86)90177-x

Google Scholar

[2] C. Laird and D. J. Duquette, Corros. Fatigue, (1972) NACE-2, p.88.

Google Scholar

[3] M. W. Brown and K. J. Miller, (Fatigue Engng Mater. Struct. 1979), Vols. 1, p.231.

Google Scholar

[4] T. Eterashvili, G. Abuladze, L. Kotiashvili, T. Dzigrashvili and M. Vardosanidze. SEM Study of Fatigue Crack Propagation in Chromium Martensitic Steel after LCF. Key Engineering Materials. ISSN: 1662-9795, Vol. 754, pp.15-18 (2017).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.754.15

Google Scholar

[5] T. Eterashvili T. Dzigrashvili, M. Vardosanidze. SEM Study of the Influence of Microstructure on Low Cycle Fatigue Crack Growth in Martensitic Steel I. Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 774, pp.96-100, (2018).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.774.96

Google Scholar

[6] T. Etereshvili, L. Utevsky, M. Spasky. The Structure of Packet Martensite and Localization of the retained Austenite in Structural Steel. The Physics of Metals and Metallography, 48, 4, (1979) p.pp.807-815.

Google Scholar

[7] T. Eterashvili, N. Khasia. The Structure of Packet Martensite and Internal Stresses. The Physics of Metals and Metallography, 67, 2, (1989) p.pp.329-333.

Google Scholar

[8] T. Dzigrashvili, Computer Simulation of Electron Diffraction Patterns and Stereographic Projections. John Wiley & Sons LTD, Microscopy and Analysis, January (2008) p.pp.5-7. https://microscopy-analysis.com/magazine/issues/computer-simulation-electron-diffraction-patterns-and-stereographic-projection.

Google Scholar