Investigation of Low Rotational Speeds Effect during Centrifugal Casting on the Mechanical Properties of Polymer Composites Material

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this article, we present our developed and manufactured centrifugal casting machine. We present the results of mechanical testing of samples from polymer composites made on it. At the beginning we give an overview of the main trends in the market of polymer composites. We consider the main factors affecting the mechanical characteristics of polymer composites, and determine the main limitations of using centrifugal casting technology for polymer composites. In conclusion, we give directions for further research. Many industries use polymer composite materials (PMC) to meet production needs. The main advantage of PMC is the possibility of obtaining high strength with relatively low weight, as well as the possibility of obtaining additional necessary properties, such as dielectric, magnetic, etc. The PMC market continues to grow, and now PMC is widely used in aircraft manufacturing, automotive, medicine, etc. [1]. Despite the positive aspects of using PMC, this method has some drawbacks. Firstly, low automation of the process of casting parts from PMC. Many technologies are quite difficult to automate due to their process complexity and constant monitoring. Development in this direction is already underway, and there are practical solutions, such as automatic tape placement (ATL) / automatic fiber placement (AFP) [2]. On the other hand, the cost of these solutions is quite high. Secondly, the high cost of the equipment and tooling manufacturing. Such technologies as pressing, pressing and autoclave molding using prepregs are attached to certain technological equipment and need to organize pressure, maintain temperature, etc. This increases the range of equipment used and overall process complexity. In some technologies using high pressure and heat-cooling such as pressure casting (RTM) [3], it is necessary to use high-strength steels for molds, the processing of which takes a long time and wears the tool. Thirdly, increased knowledge-intensive work and high requirements for staff qualifications [4]. Manufacturing products from PMC requires careful monitoring by the technologist, since the influence of such parameters as: temperature, pressure will affect on the product structure and, accordingly, its characteristics. Fourthly, loss of strength after cutting operations (such as drilling, milling, taping and so on) and further stratification of PMC [5]. This leads us to the fact that used technology should maximally ensure the product geometry with minimization of subsequent post-processing.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

6-12

Citation:

Online since:

March 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H. Kargarzadeh, J. Huang, N. Lin et al.: submitted to Progress. in polymer science 87 (2018) 197–227.

Google Scholar

[2] W. Woigk, S.R. Hallett, M.I. Jones et al.: submitted to Composite Structures 201 (2018) 1004–1017.

Google Scholar

[3] M. Haider, P. Hubert and L. Lessard: submitted to Comp. Sci. and Tech. 67(15-16) (2007) 3176–3186.

Google Scholar

[4] C. Kaynak, E. Akgul and N.A. Isitman: submitted to J. of Comp. Mat. 42 (2008) 1505–1521.

Google Scholar

[5] N.N. Trushin and V.N. Lisitsin: submitted to IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 327 (2018) 042110.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/327/4/042110

Google Scholar

[6] I.A.R. Torn, and T.H.J. Vaneker: submitted to Proc. Manuf. 28 (2019) 135–141.

Google Scholar

[7] B. Vieille, V.M. Casado and C. Bouvet: submitted to Composite Structures 101 (2013) 9–21.

Google Scholar

[8] D. Saenz-Castillo, M.I. Martín, S. Calvo et al.: submitted to Composites: Part A. 121  308–320.

Google Scholar

[9] R.A. Witik, F. Gaille, R. Teuscher et al.: submitted to J. of Cl. Prod. 29-30 (2012) 91–102.

Google Scholar

[10] T. Yao, Z. Deng, K. Zhang and S. Li: submitted to Comp. Part B: Eng. 163 (2019) 393–402.

Google Scholar

[11] Z. Qureshi, T. Swait, R. Scaife and H.M. El-Dessouky: submitted to Composites, Part B 66 (2014) 255–267.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.05.025

Google Scholar

[12] N.J. Lee, J. Jang, M. Park and C.R. Choe: submitted to J. of Material Sci. 32(8) (1997) 2013–(2020).

Google Scholar

[13] D.Y. Ershov, E.G. Zlotnikov and L.E. Koboyankwe: submitted to IOP Conf. Ser. Earth and Environmental Sci. 87(8) (2017) 82016–82016.

Google Scholar

[14] A.E. Efimov, V.V. Maksarov and D.Y. Timofeev: submitted to IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. and Engineer. 327(2) (2018) 022026.

Google Scholar

[15] G. Melnikov, N. Dudarenko, V. Melnikov and A. Alyshev: submitted to Applied Mathematical Sci. 136(9) (2015) 6757–6765.

DOI: 10.12988/ams.2015.59584

Google Scholar

[16] A. Alyshev, N. Dudarenko and V. Melnikov: submitted to Cybernetics and Physics 7(2) (2018) 57–65.

Google Scholar

[17] A.V. Balyakin, E.M. Dobryshkina, R.A. Vdovin and V.P. Alekseev: submitted to IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Engineer. 327 (2018) 022025.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/327/2/022025

Google Scholar

[18] J. Stabik, A. Dybowska and M. Chomiak: submitted to J. of Ach. in Mat. and Manuf. Engineer. 43 (2010) 153–161.

Google Scholar

[19] H. Li, C. Richards and J. Watson: submitted to J. of Appl. Glass Sci. 5(1) (2013) 65–81.

Google Scholar