Effect of Various Input Parameters on Compressed Earth Block’s Strength

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the framework of this study, compressed earth blocks (CEB) were produced using waste materials and various parameters. Material parameters included waste soil, recycled concrete, fly ash, cement, admixtures and water contents. Manufacturing parameters were vibration during manufacturing, confinement pressure, curing environment and curing time. Specimens used in this study were cubes and compressive strength testing was used to evaluate different mixtures and manufacturing methods. In terms of compressive strength, compressed earth blocks made of these materials could be used for manufacturing bricks and other structural elements.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

81-87

Citation:

Online since:

April 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] P. Konrád, P. Gallo, R. Sovják, Š. Pešková, J. Valentin, The applicability of by-products in civil engineering for production of eco-bricks, Technika ochrany prostredia (2019) pp.1-6.

Google Scholar

[2] M. Ben Mansour, A. Jelidi, A.S. Cherif, S. Ben Jabrallah, Optimizing thermal and mechanical performance of compressed earth blocks (CEB), Constr. Build. Mater. 104 (2016) 44–51.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.024

Google Scholar

[3] M. Mostafa, N. Uddin, Experimental analysis of Compressed Earth Block (CEB) with banana fibers resisting flexural and compression forces, Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 5 (2016) 53–63.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2016.07.001

Google Scholar

[4] S.O. Sore, A. Messan, E. Prud'homme, G. Escadeillas, F. Tsobnang, Stabilization of compressed earth blocks (CEBs) by geopolymer binder based on local materials from Burkina Faso, Constr. Build. Mater. 165 (2018) 333–345.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.051

Google Scholar

[5] H. Porter, J. Blake, N. K. Dhami, A. Mukherjee, Rammed earth blocks with improved multifunctional performance, Cem. Concr. Compos. 92 (2018) 36–46.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.04.013

Google Scholar

[6] F.V. Riza, I.A. Rahman, Eco-Efficient Mason. Bricks Blocks, Elsevier, 2015, 379–392.

Google Scholar

[7] G. Ruiz, X. Zhang, W. F. Edris, I. Cañas, L. Garijo, A comprehensive study of mechanical properties of compressed earth blocks, Constr. Build. Mater. 176 (2018) 566–572.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.077

Google Scholar

[8] J.D. Sitton, Y. Zeinali, W.H. Heidarian, B.A. Story, Effect of mix design on compressed earth block strength, Constr. Build. Mater. 158 (2018) 124–131.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.005

Google Scholar

[9] ASTM D2487-17, Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, (2017).

Google Scholar

[10] R. Sovják, Š. Pešková, V. Šmilauer, M. Mára, P. Růžička, L. Černá Vydrová, P. Konvalinka, Utilization of crumb rubber and FBC-based ternary binder in shotcrete lining, Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 11 (2019) e00234.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2019.e00234

Google Scholar

[11] ČSN 72 2609, Method of Tests for Masonry Units - Specific Properties of Clay Masonry Units, Úřad Pro Technickou Normalizaci, Metrologii A Státní Zkušebnictví, Prague, (2017).

Google Scholar