Hemp Fiber Reinforced Geopolymer Composites: Effects of NaOH Concentration on Fiber Pre-Treatment Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

High demand for using parts of natural materials, e.g., cores, fibers or leaves, as alternative additives are being increased. The main reasons are that natural materials can be served as renewable and eco-friendly choices such a sustainable development. Nevertheless, some limitations of applying those natural products, such as biodegradation, UV degradation, or weak bonding, are raised and need to be modified before further handling. One of the modification techniques for bio-based materials is chemical treatment by using alkaline solution (alkalization). Treatment process allows the plant's fiber to have fewer impurities as well as to increase the bonding on its contacting surface area. This research focuses on (i) effects of NaOH solution concentration on the pre-treatment properties of hemp fibers and (ii) self-treatment behavior of hemp fiber in geopolymer composites. The results show that the concentration of NaOH solution directly affected the pre-treatment process of hemp fiber as higher concentration from 1, 3, 5, 8, 10 to 12 Molar provided more vanishing level of fiber impurities, indicated by Contact Angle (CA) measurement and Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) Spectroscopy analysis. With the concept of alkaline treatment, the self-treatment process was therefore applied for hemp fiber incorporated in alkaline-activated geopolymer matrix. The results illustrate the self-treatment behavior of hemp fiber in geopolymer composites, which could improve the final performances of the hardened products without conventional pre-treatment process.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

166-170

Citation:

Online since:

May 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H. Bedlivá, N. Isaacs, Hempcrete–an environmentally friendly material?, Adv. Mater. Res. Trans Tech Publications, 1041 (2014) 83-86.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.1041.83

Google Scholar

[2] Z. Li, L. Wang, X. J. F. Wang, Compressive and flexural properties of hemp fiber reinforced concrete, Fibers Polym. 5(3) (2004) 187-197.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02902998

Google Scholar

[3] L. Y. Mwaikambo, M. P. J. J. o. a. p. s. Ansell, Chemical modification of hemp, sisal, jute, and kapok fibers by alkalization, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 84(12) (2002) 2222-2234.

DOI: 10.1002/app.10460

Google Scholar

[4] J. Cruz, R. J. P. E. Fangueiro, Surface modification of natural fibers: a review, Procedia Eng. 155 (2016) 285-288.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.030

Google Scholar

[5] R. Vijay, D. L. Singaravelu, A. Vinod, M. Sanjay, S. Siengchin, M. Jawaid, A. Khan, J. J. I. j. o. b. m. Parameswaranpillai, Characterization of raw and alkali treated new natural cellulosic fibers from Tridax procumbens, Int. J. Biologic. macromolecules, 125 (2019) 99-108.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.056

Google Scholar

[6] A. Shahzad, Hemp fiber and its composites–a review, J. Composite Mater. 46(8) (2012) 973-986.

Google Scholar

[7] T. Zhao, L. Jiang, Contact angle measurement of natural materials, Colloids Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 161 (2018) 324-330.

DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.10.056

Google Scholar

[8] D. Dai, M. Fan, Characteristic and performance of elementary hemp fibre, Mater. Sci. Appl. 1(6) (2010) 336-342.

Google Scholar