Production Chains of Soft-Weak Stones: Life Cycle Inventory of Techniques and Technologies

Abstract:

The dimension stone sector is more and more active in developing new solutions to improve the sustainability of its supply chain, partly as a consequence of the current EU policies on Circular Economy and Raw Materials. The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a recognized scientific tool for evaluating environmental impacts of the processes. Nevertheless, in the stone sector, LCA is hindered by the scarce availability of Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) datasets for the specific processes of the stone supply chain. This paper provides LCI datasets of the most common and widespread techniques and related technologies for quarrying, cutting and finishing soft-weak stones. To this aim primary data were collected in Italian marble quarries and processing plants and in companies producing cutting tools. When necessary, industry data were complemented with secondary data from literature. High replicability and flexibility of the datasets is obtained through the provision of Unit process inventories for each technology/technique and through the set of parameters. In addition, the uncertainty of the resulting LCI datasets has been evaluated with the well-established procedure of Ecoinvent pedigree matrix. The availability of these datasets contributes to the population of Life Cycle databases and is expected to boost the measurement and enhancement of the key aspects of sustainability in the stone sector.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 848)
• Pages: 137-144
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.848.137
• Online since: June 2020
• Authors: Isabella Bianco*, Gian Andrea Blengini
• Keywords: Cutting Techniques, Dimension Stone Production Chain, LCA, Life Cycle Inventory, Marble, Technologies

References

[1] European Commission, Closing the loop - An EU action plan for the Circular Economy. COM/2015/0614 final,, Brussels, (2015).

[2] European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament - Integrated Product Policy. Building on Environmental Life-Cycle Thinking. Brussels, (2003).

[3] G. M. Nicoletti, B. Notarnicola, and G. Tassielli, Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of flooring materials : ceramic versus marble tiles,, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 10, p.283–296, (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/s0959-6526(01)00028-2

[4] M. Traverso, G. Rizzo, and M. Finkbeiner, Environmental performance of building materials : life cycle assessment of a typical Sicilian marble,, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., p.104–114, (2010).

DOI: 10.1007/s11367-009-0135-z

[5] M. C. Torricelli and E. Palumbo, Measuring the sustainability of the sandstone of Firenzuola: the contribution of the life cycle assessment,, in Conference proceedings book - 1st international sustainable stone conference, 2016, p.10–12.

[6] M. Taxiarchou and I. Kostopoulou, Life Cycle Analysis of dimensional stones production,, in SDIMI 2007, (2007).

[7] N. Crishna, P. F. G. Banfill, and S. Goodsir, Resources , Conservation and Recycling Embodied energy and CO 2 in UK dimension stone,, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 55, no. 12, p.1265–1273, (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.06.014

[8] A. Gazi, G. Skevis, and M. A. Founti, Energy efficiency and environmental assessment of a typical marble quarry and processing plant,, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 32, p.10–21, (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.03.007

[9] D. Ioannidou, S. Zerbi, and G. Habert, When more is better - Comparative LCA of wall systems with stone,, Build. Environ., vol. 82, p.628–639, (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.10.004

[10] J. Catarino, J. Henriques, and A. Maia, Eco-efficiency in Portuguese companies of marble sector,, Int. J. Sustain. Eng., vol. 9, no. 1, p.33–44, (2016).

[11] M. Castoldi Borlini Gadioli, N. Fernández Castro, A. De Andrade Pazeto, C. E. Ribeiro Wandermurem, P. Fernandes de Almeida, and D. Pimentel Tavares, Life-Cycle Inventory of Dimension Stones , Brazil,, in Proceedings of Global Stone Congress 2012, (2012).

[12] J.-M. F. Mendoza, M. Feced, G. Feijoo, A. Josa, X. Gabarrell, and J. Rieradevall, Life cycle inventory analysis of granite production from cradle to gate,, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., vol. 19, no. 1, p.153–165, (2014).

DOI: 10.1007/s11367-013-0637-6

[13] J.-M. F. Mendoza, C. Capitano, G. Peri, A. Josa, J. Rieradevall, and X. Gabarrell, Environmental management of granite slab production from an industrial ecology standpoint,, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 84, p.619–628, (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.056

[14] S. Bai, J. Zhang, and Z. Wang, Selection of a sustainable technology for cutting granite block into slabs,, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 112, p.2278–2291, (2016).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.052

[15] European Commission, ILCD Handbook - General Guide for Life Cycle Assessment - Detailed Guidance,, Ispra (VA) Italy, (2010).

[16] The International Standards Organisation, Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework,, Iso 14040, vol. 2006, p.1–28, (2006).

[17] The International Standards Organisation, Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Requirements and guidelines,, ISO 14044, vol. 2006, no. 7, p.652–668, (2006).

DOI: 10.3403/30290345

[18] P. Primavori, Pianeta Pietra. (1999).

[19] P. Primavori, I materiali lapidei della Sardegna, 1st ed. Sardegna Ricerche, (2011).

[20] M. Cardu, Analysis of the Excavation Techniques to Optimize the productivity in an Italian Dimension Stone Basin,, in Diamante. Applicazioni & Tecnologia, 2012, p.115–124.

[21] M. Cardu, Analisi delle tecniche estrattive adottate in un bacino italiano di pietra ornamentale per ottimizzare la produttività,, Diamante. Applicazioni & Tecnologia, vol. 18, no. 72, p.55–65, (2013).

[22] A. Giuffrida, I materiali lapidei tradizionali nell'architettura contemporanea . La pietra di Siracusa.,, Università degli Studi di Catania, (2010).

[23] A. Masciullo, Valutazione ambientale di prodotti lapidei per le costruzioni. Applicazione al caso studio della pietra Leccese e proposte per la sua valorizzazione,, Università degli Studi di Firenze, (2016).

DOI: 10.36253/978-88-6655-307-6