Rate-Dependent Material Properties of Adhesively Bonded Joints - Must Have or Nice to Have?

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the context of automotive crash simulation, rate-dependent properties are sought for all materials undergoing deformation. Measuring rate-dependent properties of adhesively bonded joints is a challenging and associated with additional cost. This article assesses the need for having rate-dependent properties of adhesively bonded joints for the example of a typical automotive structure, an adhesively bonded metallic T-joint. Using Finite Element simulation it could be shown that good agreement between experiment and simulation was only achieved if rate-dependent properties were considered for the adhesive.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

14-19

Citation:

Online since:

August 2020

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S. Hiermaier and T. Meenken, Characterization of low-impedence materials at elevated strain rates,, J Strain Analysis, vol. 45, pp.401-409, (2010).

DOI: 10.1243/03093247jsa584

Google Scholar

[2] R. Gerlach, C. Siviour, J. Wiegand and N. Petrinic, The strain rate dependent material behaviour of S-GFRP extracted from GLARE,, Mech Adv Mater Struct, pp.505-514, (2012).

DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2011.627646

Google Scholar

[3] M. Isakov, J. Lange, S. Kilchert and M. May, In-situ damage evaluation of pure ice under high-rate compressive loading,, Materials, vol. 12, no. 8, p.1236, (2019).

DOI: 10.3390/ma12081236

Google Scholar

[4] G. Jacob, J. Starbuck, J. Fellers, S. Simunovic and R. Boeman, The Effect of Loading Rate on the Fracture Toughness of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites,, J Appl Polym Sci, pp.899-904, (2005).

DOI: 10.1002/app.21535

Google Scholar

[5] M. May, Measuring the rate-dependent mode I fracture toughness of composites – A review,, Compos Part A - Appl S, pp.1-12, (2016).

Google Scholar

[6] M. May and T. Lässig, Rate-dependent mode I delamination in ballistic composites - Experiment and simulation,, Composite Structures, vol. 180, pp.596-605, (2017).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.045

Google Scholar

[7] M. May and O. Hesebeck, Assessment of experimental methods for calibrating rate-dependent cohesive zone models for predicting failure in adhesively bonded metallic structures,, Eng Fail Anal, pp.441-453, (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.12.008

Google Scholar

[8] H. Paul, N. Ledford, M. Sauer, M. May and M. Okamura, Assessment of test methods for thick and thin layer adhesive joints under high rates of loading,, Int J Adhes Adhes, vol. 83, pp.123-129, (2018).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.02.025

Google Scholar

[9] P. Jousset and M. Rachik, Comparison and evaluation of two types of cohesive zonemodels for the finite element analysis of fracture propagationin industrial bonded structures,, Eng Fract Mech, vol. 132, pp.48-69, (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.10.018

Google Scholar

[10] M. May, O. Hesebeck, S. Marzi, W. Böhme, J. Lienhard, S. Kilchert, M. Brede and S. Hiermaier, Rate-dependent behavior of crash-optimized adhesives - Experimental characterization, model development, and simulation,, Eng Fract Mech, pp.112-137, (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.11.006

Google Scholar

[11] M. May and O. Hesebeck, Failure of adhesively bonded metallic T-joints subjected to quasi-static and crash loading,, Eng Fail Anal, pp.454-463, (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.12.007

Google Scholar

[12] M. May, H. Voß and S. Hiermaier, Predictive modeling of damage and failure in adhesively bonded metallic joints using cohesive interface elements,, Int J Adhes Adhes, pp.7-17, (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.12.001

Google Scholar

[13] A. Turon, C. Davila, P. Camanho and J. Costa, An engineering solution for mesh size effects in the simulation of delamination using cohesive zone models,, Eng Fract Mech, pp.1665-1682, (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.08.025

Google Scholar