Comparison of Recycled Waste Amount for Construction and Demolition (C&D) Waste between Two Apartment Projects

Article Preview

Abstract:

Construction and Demolition (C&D) waste is increasing enormously due to rapid growth of construction industry in developing countries. A few irresponsible contractors dumped illegally the excessive C&D waste in the forest, mangrove swamp, oil palm plantations, roadside and in the sea or lake. However, there are some responsible contractors who carried out recycling practices in the construction project to cut the amount of waste sent to gazette landfills which are approved by local authorities or government. Therefore, this paper is aimed to investigate the total C&D waste amount recycled waste before sending it to designated landfills. This study only focused on four types of C&D waste namely timber, metal, concrete and packaging material. The method that is used for this study is ‘on-site quantification’ based on the volume and gathered ‘recorded recycling amount’ from the project manager and safety officer. This study is conducted at two construction apartments (site I and site II) in Johor Bahru. The data collection was taken weekly for 6 months’ period. The collected data were analyzed using cumulative amount of volume, weight in meters (m3) and percentages. As results, timber was the dominant waste produced at site I while metal waste was highly generated in Site II. About 47% (29.85m3) of total waste produced at site I was timber waste. About 49% (50.39m3) of metal waste generated at site II. There are 36.13m3 of C&D waste recycled at site I and 66.21m3 of C&D waste was recycled at site II. The study found that timber and metal were highly recycled waste materials at both apartments. Finally, a total of 473.86m3 waste recycled in both projects, and this amount save from to be dumped at landfills which is not a suitable hierarchy. This study will create awareness to all construction practitioners, about the needs of recycling practice to minimize the amount of C&D waste send to landfills.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

103-110

Citation:

Online since:

March 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Environmental Protection Agency US, Waste and Resources Recovery Infrastructure Strategy 2017 – 2021, (2017) Report No. EPA2017-p-0169.

Google Scholar

[2] M.R. Esa, A. Halog, & Rigamonti, L, Strategies for minimizing construction and demolition wastes in Malaysia, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 120, (2017) 219–229.

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.12.014

Google Scholar

[3] S.Kaliannan, S.Nagapan, A. H. Abdullah, S. Sohu, & Jhatial, A. A, Determining Root Cause of Construction Waste Generation: A Global Context, Civil Engineering Journal. (2018) 2539 -2547.

DOI: 10.28991/cej-03091179

Google Scholar

[4] S.Nagapan, I. Abdul Rahman, & A. Asmi, Construction waste management: Malaysian perspective, The International Conference on Civil and Environmental Engineering Sustainability IConCEES, Vol. 2. (2012) 1-11.

Google Scholar

[5] S.Nagapan, I. A. Rahman, A.Asmi & N. F Adnan, Study of site's construction waste in Batu Pahat, Johor, Procedia Engineering. (2013) 99-103.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.02.015

Google Scholar

[6] M.A. Sarabatin, RM2b urus sisa pepejal, Newspaper, Berita Harian. 5 February (2016).

Google Scholar

[7] R.Wang, & S.Li, Talking about the Production and Disposing of construction Waste from the View of Sustainable Development, Asia- Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference. (2011).

DOI: 10.1109/appeec.2011.5748361

Google Scholar

[8] Okeyinka, O. M., Oloke, D. A., & Khatib, J. M, A Review on recycled use of solid wastes in building materials, International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering. (2015) 1578-1587.

Google Scholar

[9] Kulatunga, U., Amaratunga, D., Haigh, R., & Rameezdeen, R. Attitudes and perceptions of construction workforce on construction waste in Sri Lanka, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal (2006).

DOI: 10.1108/14777830610639440

Google Scholar

[10] Indrawati, D., & Purwaningrum, P, Identification and analysis the illegal dumping spot of solid waste at Ciliwung segment 5 riverbanks. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing. (2018) 012043.

DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/106/1/012043

Google Scholar

[11] Rahmat, N. S., Ibrahim, A. H., & Rounce, G, Illegal Dumping Site: Case Study in the District of Johor Bahru Tengah. Penang, Malaysia. (2007).

Google Scholar

[12] Duan, Huabo, Jiayuan Wang, and Qifei Huang, Encouraging the environmentally sound management of C&D waste in China:An integrative review and research agenda. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 43 (2015): 611-620.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.069

Google Scholar

[13] Dajadian, Shant A., and Daphene C. Koch, Waste management models and their applications on construction sites. International Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 3, no. 3 (2014): 91-98.

Google Scholar

[14] Hamid, Shaharin, Che Maznah Mat Isa, Shamer N Felix, and Nur Kamaliah Mustaffa, Sustainable management using recycle and reuse of construction waste materials in Malaysia. ESTEEM Academic Journal 16 (2020): 47-58.

Google Scholar

[15] Jamaludin, Amril Hadri, Nurulzatushima Abdul Karim, Raja Nor Husna Raja Mohd Noor, Nurulhidayah Othman, and Sulaiman Abdul Malik, Preliminary study on enhancing waste management best practice model in Malaysia construction industry. In AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1875, no. 1, p.030008. AIP Publishing LLC, (2017).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4998379

Google Scholar