Parametric Study of Functional Components Obtained by Additive Manufacturing Fused Filament Fabrication

Article Preview

Abstract:

Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) is a growing additive manufacturing technology for various applications in the engineering field. The mechanical properties of 3D printed materials in FFF technology depends on various parameters and the literature suggests that infill pattern and infill density are the parameters that most affect the mechanical properties of 3D printed parts.These factors have direct influence on the time of production and amount of material used. In this work it was analyzed the influence of infill parameter on stiffness of the final parts, considering the printing time and amount material used. For this purpose, the Taguchi method was used and then the statistical method of ANOVA to calculate the influence of each parameter.Test specimens were printed according to ASTM Standard D790 dimensions, in Polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG). The specimens were printed in the same position on the printing bed to reduce as much as possible the influence of external factors on the results. A visual and dimensional inspection of the specimens was carried out for further analysis. The best combination between production and stiffness, with 350 MPa/mm, was obtained with 15% infill density, concentric pattern, 45º orientation, with 4 perimeters path, layer thickness of 0.1 mm and speed of 45 mm/s. The results obtained allow us a broader view of how to save 3D printing time and the amount of material consumed during the production of a part.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

33-40

Citation:

Online since:

September 2023

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2023 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Mohsen Attaran, The rise of 3-D printing: The advantages of additive manufacturing over traditional manufacturing, Business Horizons, Volume 60, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 677-688, ISSN 0007-6813.

DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.011

Google Scholar

[2] Ngo, Tuan & Kashani, Alireza & Imbalzano, Gabriele & Nguyen, Kate & Hui, David. (2018). Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Composites Part B Engineering. 143.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012

Google Scholar

[3] Jasiuk, I., Abueidda, D.W., Kozuch, C. et al. An Overview on Additive Manufacturing of Polymers. JOM 70, 275–283 (2018)

DOI: 10.1007/s11837-017-2730-y

Google Scholar

[4] Henson, Christopher & Decker, Nathan & Huang, Qiang. (2021). A digital twin strategy for major failure detection in fused deposition modeling processes. Procedia Manufacturing. 53. 359-367.

DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2021.06.039

Google Scholar

[5] I. John Solomon, P. Sevvel, J. Gunasekaran (2021). A review on the various processing parameters in FDM, Materials Today: Proceedings, Volume 37, Part 2, Pages 509-514, ISSN 2214-7853

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.484

Google Scholar

[6] Baich L. Impact of Infill Design on Mechanical Strength and Production Cost in Material Extrusion Based Additive Manufacturing. 2016.

Google Scholar

[7] Dezaki ML, Mohd Ariffin MKA. The effects of combined infill patterns on mechanical properties in fdm process. Polymers (Basel). 2020 Dec 1;12(12):1–20.

DOI: 10.3390/polym12122792

Google Scholar

[8] Vyavahare, S., Teraiya, S., Panghal, D., & Kumar, S. (2020). Fused deposition modelling: a review. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 26(1), 176-201.

DOI: 10.1108/rpj-04-2019-0106

Google Scholar

[9] C.K. Chua, K.F. Leong, 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing: Principles and Applications, (5th ed.), World Scientific Publishing Company (2017)

Google Scholar

[10] Mercado-Colmenero, Jorge Manuel, M. Dolores La Rubia, Elena Mata-Garcia, Moises Rodriguez-Santiago, and Cristina Martin-Doñate. 2020. "Experimental and Numerical Analysis for the Mechanical Characterization of PETG Polymers Manufactured with FDM Technology under Pure Uniaxial Compression Stress States for Architectural Applications" Polymers 12, no. 10: 2202

DOI: 10.3390/polym12102202

Google Scholar