The Tolerancing Obtained with Binder Jetting Additive Manufacturing Process in 17-4PH Steel - Case Study

Abstract:

Digital manufacturing is one of the pillars of Industry 4.0, additive manufacturing is certainly evolving very quickly, with more and more technologies being developed and materials being applied to this production area. However, with this growth and the capacity associated with this type of processes, it is extremely important to understand these processes, so that they can respond quantitatively and qualitatively to market needs. The present work intended to contribute to the improvement of the metal binder jetting process by simulating the manufacturing process of a proposed part, using the Simufact™ software and Desktop Metal software. After validating the parts with manufacturing with Binder jetting additive process. Subsequently, the metrological inspection and analysis of the respective results were carried out. Simulations were carried out for different values of powder size and density of the green part to assess their impact on the quality of the final part. The parts were produced in 17 – 4PH steel using a Shop System Desktop Metal machine. Were produced 5 parts with the following parameters, part (A) model with compensation obtained by Desktop software, part (B) model compensated by the Simufact additive software with 20% scale, part (C) model with scale 1: 1.2, part (D) model obtained by the Simufact additive software and part (E) model without scale. The measurements for the dimensional analysis were made with a digital caliper, while for the geometric analysis, measurements were made on a CMM machine.The simulations revealed smaller errors for larger granule sizes and also for larger green part densities. The inspection of the produced part, on the other side, exposed greater dimensional inaccuracy in X and less in Z direction. It also showed that, for the same element of the part, there is still a relationship between the ratio of the measured dimensions and the ratio of the deviations obtained. The results also showed that parts simulated by two software’s (A and D) are the ones with the best final quality, they presented smaller dimensional and geometric deviations in relation to the proposed model. The highest tolerance grades of these parts were in ISO standard IT15 and IT14 for part D and part A respectively.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 956)
• Pages: 99-106
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-IvD5Fn
• Online since: September 2023
• Authors: Eleandro Lima, Carlos Relvas, António Manuel Ramos*
• Keywords: Accuracy, Additive Manufacturing, Binder Jetting, Metallic Parts, Tolerancing

References

[1] E. M. Palmero and A. Bollero, "3D and 4D Printing of Functional and Smart Composite Materials," D. B. T.-E. of M. C. Brabazon, Ed. Oxford: Elsevier, 2021, p.402–419.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-819724-0.00008-2

[2] A. Alammar, J. C. Kois, M. Revilla-León, and W. Att, "Additive Manufacturing Technologies: Current Status and Future Perspectives," Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 31. John Wiley and Sons Inc, p.4–12, Mar. 01, 2022.

DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13477

[3] M. Li, W. Du, A. Elwany, Z. Pei, and C. Ma, "Metal Binder Jetting Additive Manufacturing: A Literature Review," J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., vol. 142, no. 9, Jun. 2020.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4047430

[4] F. Dini, S. A. Ghaffari, J. Jafar, R. Hamidreza, and S. Marjan, "A review of binder jet process parameters; powder, binder, printing and sintering condition," Met. Powder Rep., vol. 75, no. 2, p.95–100, Mar. 2020.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mprp.2019.05.001

[5] M. Vaezi and C. K. Chua, "Effects of layer thickness and binder saturation level parameters on 3D printing process," Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 53, no. 1, p.275–284, 2011.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-010-2821-1

[6] K. Lu and W. T. Reynolds, "3DP process for fine mesh structure printing," Powder Technol., vol. 187, no. 1, p.11–18, 2008.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2007.12.017

[7] S. Sadeghi Borujeni, A. Shad, K. Abburi Venkata, N. Günther, and V. Ploshikhin, "Numerical simulation of shrinkage and deformation during sintering in metal binder jetting with experimental validation," Mater. Des., vol. 216, Apr. 2022.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110490

[8] M. Zago, N. F. M. Lecis, M. Vedani, and I. Cristofolini, "Dimensional and geometrical precision of parts produced by binder jetting process as affected by the anisotropic shrinkage on sintering," Addit. Manuf., vol. 43, p.102007, Jul. 202.

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102007

[9] A. L. Maximenko, I. D. Olumor, A. P. Maidaniuk, and E. A. Olevsky, "Modeling of effect of powder spreading on green body dimensional accuracy in additive manufacturing by binder jetting," Powder Technol., vol. 385, p.60–68, 2021.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.02.070

[10] A. Mostafaei et al., "Binder jet 3D printing—Process parameters, materials, properties, modeling, and challenges," Prog. Mater. Sci., vol. 119, p.100707, 2021.

DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100707

[11] L. Rebaioli and I. Fassi, "A review on benchmark artifacts for evaluating the geometrical performance of additive manufacturing processes," Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 93, no. 5, p.2571–2598, 2017.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-017-0570-0

[12] D. Dimitrov, W. van Wijck, K. Schreve, N. de Beer, and J. Meljer, "An Investigation of the Capability Profile of the Three Dimensional Printing Process with an Emphasis on the Achievable Accuracy," CIRP Ann., vol. 52, no. 1, p.189–192, 2003,.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60562-9

[13] P. Minetola, M. Galati, F. Calignano, L. Iuliano, G. Rizza, and L. Fontana, "Comparison of dimensional tolerance grades for metal AM processes," Procedia CIRP, vol. 88, p.399–404, 2020.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2020.05.069