Recipe to Strengthen Continuous Fiber Reinforced 3D Printed Parts

Article Preview

Abstract:

Today, the design of polymer parts by additive manufacturing subjected to large stress has undergone a clear advance with the new concept of continuous fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites (CFRTPC). The optimization of fiber alignment is the main asset to improve strength and has been widely discussed by the research community. In this work, the effect of the intercalation of the polymeric matrix (ONYX) between layers of continuous fiberglass reinforcement has been analyzed in shear specimens. Onyx is nylon mixed with short carbon fibers. The results show how inserting polymeric layers among the continuous fiber ones improves the shear strength up to 25% and the stiffness modulus up to 18%.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

105-110

Citation:

Online since:

October 2023

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2023 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Sartal A, Bellas R, Mejías AM, García-Collado A. The sustainable manufacturing concept, evolution and opportunities within Industry 4.0: A literature review. Advances in Mechanical Engineering. 2020;12: 1–17.

DOI: 10.1177/1687814020925232

Google Scholar

[2] García-Collado A, Blanco JM, Gupta MK, Dorado-Vicente R. Advances in polymers based Multi-Material Additive-Manufacturing Techniques: State-of-art review on properties and applications. Additive Manufacturing. 2022;50: 102577.

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102577

Google Scholar

[3] Ilardo R, Williams CB. Design and manufacture of a Formula SAE intake system using fused deposition modeling and fiber‐reinforced composite materials. Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2010. p.174–179.

DOI: 10.1108/13552541011034834

Google Scholar

[4] Chohan JS, Singh R. Enhancing dimensional accuracy of FDM based biomedical implant replicas by statistically controlled vapor smoothing process. Progress in Additive Manufacturing. 2016. 105–113.

DOI: 10.1007/s40964-016-0009-4

Google Scholar

[5] Singh R, Paulo Davim J. Additive Manufacturing: Applications and Innovations. CRC Press; 2018.

Google Scholar

[6] Dickson AN, Abourayana HM, Dowling DP. 3D Printing of Fibre-Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites Using Fused Filament Fabrication-A Review. Polymers . 2020;12.

DOI: 10.3390/polym12102188

Google Scholar

[7] Yasa E. Additive Manufacturing of Polymer Matrix Composites. 2018.

Google Scholar

[8] Türk D-A, Brenni F, Zogg M, Meboldt M. Mechanical characterization of 3D printed polymers for fiber reinforced polymers processing. Materials & Design. 2017. p.256–265.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.01.050

Google Scholar

[9] Fidan I, Imeri A, Gupta A, Hasanov S, Nasirov A, Elliott A, et al. The trends and challenges of fiber-reinforced additive manufacturing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2019.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-018-03269-7

Google Scholar

[10] Kim T-H, Lee E-H. Planar reinforcement by sheet type stiffeners for fused deposition modeling. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology. 2020.

DOI: 10.1007/s12206-020-0912-y

Google Scholar

[11] Ferreira RTL, Amatte IC, Dutra TA, Bürger D. Experimental characterization and micrography of 3D printed PLA and PLA reinforced with short carbon fibers. Composites Part B. 2017;124: 88–100.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.013

Google Scholar

[12] Lu J, Xu L, Hu J. Micromechanical analysis of the tensile deformation behavior for 3D printed unidirectional continuous fiber reinforced thermos-plastic composites. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology. 2020.

DOI: 10.1007/s12206-020-1112-5

Google Scholar

[13] Justo J, Távara L, García-Guzmán L, París F. Characterization of 3D printed long fibre reinforced composites. Compos Struct. 2018;185.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.052

Google Scholar

[14] Yu T, Zhang Z, Song S, Bai Y, Wu D. Tensile and flexural behaviors of additively manufactured continuous carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Compos Struct. 2019;225,111147.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111147

Google Scholar

[15] Imeri A, Fidan I, Allen M, Wilson DA, Canfield S. Fatigue analysis of the fiber reinforced additively manufactured objects. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2018. p.2717–2724.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-018-2398-7

Google Scholar

[16] Mohammadizadeh M, Imeri A, Fidan I, Elkelany M. 3D printed fiber reinforced polymer composites - Structural analysis. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2019. p.107112.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107112

Google Scholar

[17] Caminero MA, Chacón JM, García-Moreno I, Reverte JM. Interlaminar bonding performance of 3D printed continuous fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modelling. Polym Test. 2018;68: 415–423.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.038

Google Scholar

[18] Iragi M, Pascual-González C, Esnaola A, Lopes CS, Aretxabaleta L. Ply and interlaminar behaviours of 3D printed continuous carbon fibre-reinforced thermoplastic laminates; effects of processing conditions and microstructure. Additive Manufacturing. 2019;30: 100884.

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2019.100884

Google Scholar

[19] Yavas D, Zhang Z, Liu Q, Wu D. Interlaminar shear behavior of continuous and short carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites fabricated by additive manufacturing. Composites Part B. 2021;204: 108460.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108460

Google Scholar

[20] Laffan MJ, Pinho ST, Robinson P, McMillan AJ. Translaminar fracture toughness testing of composites: A review. Polym Test. 2012;31: 481–489.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.01.002

Google Scholar

[21] Sutton MA, Orteu JJ, Schreier H. Image Correlation for Shape, Motion and Deformation Measurements: Basic Concepts,Theory and Applications. Springer Science & Business Media; 2009.

DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-78747-3

Google Scholar

[22] Vasco‐Olmo JM, Díaz FA. Experimental evaluation of crack shielding during fatigue crack growth using digital image correlation. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 2015.

DOI: 10.1111/ffe.12136

Google Scholar