Effect of Printing Orientation on Product Quality and Overall Process Efficiency: an Experimental Investigation

Article Preview

Abstract:

Additive Manufacturing (AM) technologies, also known as 3D printing, are increasingly used to produce usable and appealing end products. Besides allowing greater design freedom, 3D printing can increase material efficiency and drastically reduce production time. However, processes are still lacking in the quality of products. Among dozens of parameters that can influence the printing process, the study analyses the impact of the printing orientation (PO) on the product's geometrical accuracy and the process's overall efficiency. An experimental analysis has been designed and executed. A Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) machine has been used to print the specimens. In particular, the experimental results showed the influence of PO on the geometrical characteristics of the specimens (bending angle, torsion angle, deviations, flatness tolerance and thickness). Moreover, the variability of production time, cost and resource consumption by varying PO has been investigated. As expected, the worst geometrical performance is shown by upright specimens. Furthermore, the ANOVA analysis underlines that only the orientation of the specimen with respect to the Z-axes (flat, on-edge and up-right) is statistically significant for the geometrical accuracy of the specimens. The method ELECTRE I has been used as Multi Criteria Decision-Making Method to rank the build configurations according to the resulting product's geometrical accuracy, the process performance and decision-maker’s priorities.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

57-66

Citation:

Online since:

October 2023

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2023 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. A. Matos, A. M. A. C. Rocha, and A. I. Pereira, Improving additive manufacturing performance by build orientation optimization, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech., 107, 5–6 (2020).

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-020-04942-6

Google Scholar

[2] M. Fera, F. Fruggiero, A. Lambiase, and R. Macchiaroli, State of the art of additive manufacturing: Review for tolerances, mechanical resistance and production costs, Cogent Eng, 3, 1 (2016).

DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2016.1261503

Google Scholar

[3] S. A. M. Tofail, E. P. Koumoulos, A. Bandyopadhyay, S. Bose, L. O'Donoghue, and C. Charitidis, Additive manufacturing: scientific and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities, Materials Today, 21, 1 (2018).

DOI: 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.001

Google Scholar

[4] M. E. H. Korner, M. P. Lambán, J. A. Albajez, J. Santolaria, L. D. C. N. Corrales, and J. Royo, Systematic literature review: Integration of additive manufacturing and industry 4.0, Metals, 10, 8 (2020).

DOI: 10.3390/met10081061

Google Scholar

[5] A. du Plessis and S. Beretta, Killer notches: The effect of as-built surface roughness on fatigue failure in AlSi10Mg produced by laser powder bed fusion, Addit. Manuf., 35 (2020).

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101424

Google Scholar

[6] T. D. Szucs and D. Brabazon, Analysis of the effects of 3DP parameters on part feature dimensional accuracy, in 18th Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, SFF (2007).

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Kok et al., Anisotropy and heterogeneity of microstructure and mechanical properties in metal additive manufacturing: A critical review, Mater. Des., 139 (2018).

Google Scholar

[8] E. Yasa, O. Poyraz, E. U. Solakoglu, G. Akbulut, and S. Oren, A Study on the Stair Stepping Effect in Direct Metal Laser Sintering of a Nickel-based Superalloy, Procedia CIRP (2016).

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.068

Google Scholar

[9] N. Guo and M. C. Leu, "Additive manufacturing: Technology, applications and research needs," Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 8, 3 (2013).

Google Scholar

[10] P. Delfs, M. T̈ows, and H. J. Schmid, "Optimized build orientation of additive manufactured parts for improved surface quality and build time," Addit. Manuf., 12 (2016).

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2016.06.003

Google Scholar

[11] L. di Angelo, P. di Stefano, and E. Guardiani, "Search for the optimal build direction in additive manufacturing technologies: A review," J. Manuf. and Mater. Proc., 4 (2020).

DOI: 10.3390/jmmp4030071

Google Scholar

[12] Formlabs, The 2022 3D Printing Applications Report, (2022).

Google Scholar

[13] A. Jaisingh Sheoran and H. Kumar, Fused Deposition modeling process parameters optimization and effect on mechanical properties and part quality: Review and reflection on present research, Materials Today: Proceedings (2020).

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.296

Google Scholar

[14] A. Dey and N. Yodo, "A systematic survey of FDM process parameter optimization and their influence on part characteristics," J. Manuf. and Mater. Proc., vol. 3, no. 3. 2019.

DOI: 10.3390/jmmp3030064

Google Scholar

[15] E. García, P. J. Núñez, J. M. Chacón, M. A. Caminero, and S. Kamarthi, Comparative study of geometric properties of unreinforced PLA and PLA-Graphene composite materials applied to additive manufacturing using FFF technology, Polym. Test, 91 (2020).

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106860

Google Scholar

[16] E. García Plaza, P. J. Núñez López, M. Á. Caminero Torija, and J. M. Chacón Muñoz, Analysis of PLA geometric properties processed by FFF additive manufacturing: Effects of process parameters and plate-extruder precision motion, Polymers (Basel), 11, 10 (2019).

DOI: 10.3390/polym11101581

Google Scholar

[17] C. C. Wang, T. W. Lin, and S. S. Hu, "Optimizing the rapid prototyping process by integrating the Taguchi method with the Gray relational analysis," Rapid. Prototyp. J., 13, 5 (2007).

DOI: 10.1108/13552540710824814

Google Scholar

[18] A. K. Sood, R. K. Ohdar, and S. S. Mahapatra, Improving dimensional accuracy of Fused Deposition Modelling processed part using grey Taguchi method, Mater. Des., 30, 10 (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.04.030

Google Scholar

[19] V. B. Nidagundi, R. Keshavamurthy, and C. P. S. Prakash, Studies on Parametric Optimization for Fused Deposition Modelling Process, Materials Today: Proceedings (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.097

Google Scholar

[20] A. Alafaghani, A. Qattawi, B. Alrawi, and A. Guzman, Experimental Optimization of Fused Deposition Modelling Processing Parameters: A Design-for-Manufacturing Approach, Procedia Manuf. (2017).

DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.079

Google Scholar

[21] B. Vasudevarao, D. P. Natarajan, and M. Henderson, Sensitivity of Rp Surface Finish To Process, Solid freeform fabrication proceedings (2000).

Google Scholar

[22] W. de O. S. Soares, R. S. Peruchi, R. A. V. Silva, and P. Rotella Junior, Gage R&R studies in measurement system analysis: A systematic literature review, Qual. Eng, 34, 3 (2022).

DOI: 10.1080/08982112.2022.2069505

Google Scholar

[23] J. R. Figueira, V. Mousseau, and B. Roy, ELECTRE methods, International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, 233 (2016).

Google Scholar