For Libraries For Publication Open Access Downloads About Us Contact Us
Paper Titles
Preface
Experimental Investigations for Assessment of Carbon Emissions and Tool Temperature in Dry Turning Operation Using Al1070 Alloy
p.3
Mechanical Tests of EN AW 5754 Aluminium Alloy Clinch Joints
p.13
Investigation of Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Al Alloys Lap Joints by Friction Stir Welding
p.25
Exploring the Effects of Open-Air Cooling on the Formation of Microstructure in Cast A356 Aluminum Alloy
p.33
Novel Process Approach for Extrusion-Based Metal Wire Additive Manufacturing Using Induction Heating as a Heat Source
p.45
Effect of Build Height on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Hollow Tubes Fabricated Using Arc-DED Process
p.53
Enhancing Surface Finish in FDM 3D Printing: The Impact of a Spherical Ironing Tool
p.61
Influence of Selected Printing Parameters on the Mechanical Behavior of FDM-Printed ABS Specimens Using Taguchi Method
p.67

Experimental Investigations for Assessment of Carbon Emissions and Tool Temperature in Dry Turning Operation Using Al1070 Alloy

Article Preview

Abstract:

Dry turning operations are required to be performed during production to achieve sustainable development goals as per environmental protection guidelines. In such machining operations, there is no need of supply of mineral based cutting fluids (MBCF) which creates problems of environment contamination and health risks to operators such as lung cancer, eye irritation and skin diseases etc. Al1070 alloys are currently used in construction industry, transport, communication cables and refrigerator cabinets as light weight structural material. The main objectives of the present study are to explore the dry turning operation (without use of MBCF) using Al1070 alloy. The X-ray fluorescence elemental analysis was performed to check composition of MBCF. Several harmful elements such as phosphorus, chlorine, and zinc dialkyl dithiophosphate were present which create high health risk to operators in turning operation with MBCF. The work piece, the cutting tool, the electricity consumption, and the recycling of the chips during the turning process contributed to the total carbon emissions. Significant positive impacts on environment have been achieved in dry turning operation as compared to tuning with MBCF. 19.85% reduction in carbon emissions and 37.12% reduction in tool temperature were achieved in dry turning operation with minimal tool wear and surface defects.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
The 22nd International Conference on Recent Advances in Mechanical Engineering for Sustainable Development (ISME) View Preview
Properties and Processing of Steel and Alloys, Additive Manufacturing View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 996)

Pages:

3-11

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/p-3AWUuk

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

December 2024

Authors:

Tauseef Uddin Siddiqui*, Zahid A. Khan, Arshad Noor Siddiquee, Vineet Kumar

Keywords:

Al1070 Alloy, Carbon Emissions, Dry Turning, MBCF, Tool Temperature

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2024 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] D. Jang, J. Jung, J. Seok, Modeling and parameter optimization for cutting energy reduction in MQL milling process. Int J Precis Eng Manuf-Green Tech (2016) 3:5–12.

DOI: 10.1007/s40684-016-0001-y

Google Scholar

[2] S. Debnath, M.M. Reddy, Q.S.Yi, Environmental friendly cutting fluids and cooling techniques in machining: a review. J Clean Prod (2014) 83:33–47.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.071

Google Scholar

[3] S.H. Musavi, B. Davoodi, M. Nankali, Creating the micro-grooves on tool rake face for improving the anti-wear properties. Modares Mech Eng (2018) 18:1–10.

Google Scholar

[4] S.H. Musavi SH, B. Davoodi, S.A. Niknam, Environmental-friendly turning of A286 superalloy. J Manuf Process (2018) 32:734–743.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.04.005

Google Scholar

[5] R.M. Park, Risk assessment for metalworking fluids and cancer outcomes. Am J Ind Med (2018) 61(3):198–203.

Google Scholar

[6] B. Davoodi, S.H. Musavi, M. Nankali, Development a new cutting tool by changing the surface texture for increasing the machining performance. Modares Mech Eng (2017) 17(7):441–450.

Google Scholar

[7] K.K. Gajrani, D. Ram, M.R. Sankar, Biodegradation and hard machining performance comparison of eco-friendly cutting fluid and mineral oil using flood cooling and minimum quantity cutting fluid techniques. J Clean Prod (2017) 165:1420–1435.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.217

Google Scholar

[8] S. Ghosh, P.V. Rao, Application of sustainable techniques in metal cutting for enhanced machinability: a review. J Clean Prod (2015) 100:17– 34.

Google Scholar

[9] S.H. Musavi & B. Davoodi, Risk assessment for hazardous lubricants in machining industry, Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2021) 28:625–634.

DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-10472-1

Google Scholar

[10] A.K. Cakir, A new approach to minimize carbon emission rate in turning processes, International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies 2021; 16, 1444–1452, The Oxford University Press.

DOI: 10.1093/ijlct/ctab058

Google Scholar

[11] K. Fang, N. Uhana, F. Zhao, J.W. Sutherland, A new approach to scheduling in manufacturing for power consumption and carbon footprint reduction. J Manuf Syst (2011) 30:234–40

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2011.08.004

Google Scholar

[12] L.I. Tong, C.C. Chen, C.H. Wang, Optimization of multi-response processes using the VIKOR method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2007) 31:1049–57.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-005-0284-6

Google Scholar

[13] T. Gutowski, The efficiency and eco-efficiency of manufacturing. Int J Nanomanuf (2010) 6:38–45.

Google Scholar

[14] J.S. Song, K.M. Lee, Development of a low-carbon product design system based on embedded GHG emissions. Resour Conserv Recycling (2010) 54: 547–56.

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.10.012

Google Scholar

[15] Y. Halevi, E. Carpanzano, G. Montalbano, Y. Koren, Minimum energy control of redundant actuation machine tools. Manuf Technol (2011) 60:433–6.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.032

Google Scholar

[16] T. Bhuiyan, I. Ahmed. Optimization of cutting parameters in turning process. SAE Int J Mater Manuf (2014) 7:233–9.

Google Scholar

[17] M.T. Sijo, N. Biju, Taguchi method for optimization of cutting parameters in turning operations. AMAE Int J Manuf Mater Sci (2011) 1:44–6.

Google Scholar

[18] S. Dharindom, S. Dhrupad, B.B. Parimal, N. Thuleswar, Taguchi optimization of cutting parameters in turning AISI 1020 MS with M2 HSS tool. IOP Conference Series: Material Science Engineering (2017) 225 012186.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/225/1/012186

Google Scholar

[19] J.R. Duflou, J.W. Sutherland, D. Dornfeld, C. Herrmann, J. Jeswiet, S. Kara, M. Hauschild and K. Kellens, Towards energy and resource efficient manufacturing: a processes and systems approach. Manuf Technol (2012) 61:587–609.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2012.05.002

Google Scholar

[20] G.T. Gutowski, B.J. Dahmus, A. Thiriez, Electrical energy requirements for manufacturing processes. In 13th CIRP International Conference of Life Cycle Engineering. Leuven, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, ISBN: 905682712X, 9789056827120 (2006).

Google Scholar

[21] W. Li, S. Kara, An empirical model for predicting energy consumption of manufacturing processes: a case of turning process. J Eng Manuf (2011) 225:1636–46.

Google Scholar

[22] Y.T. Iç, F.S. Akkoç, N. Gümü¸sboga, Z. Ballı, Development of a model that minimizes carbon emission in turning process. J Mach Des Manuf (2016) 14:1.

Google Scholar

[23] C Li, Y. Tang, L. Cui et al. A quantitative approach to analyze carbon emissions of CNC-based machining systems. JIntellManuf (2015) 26:911–22.

DOI: 10.1007/s10845-013-0812-4

Google Scholar

[24] A. Saravanakumar, P. Sreenivas, S. Vijayakumar, U. Pradeepkumar,  L. Rajeshkumar, Optimization of drilling process parameters for self-lubricants reinforced aluminium metal matrix composites, Mat today: Proc (2022) 52(3):1461-1465.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.196

Google Scholar

[25] R. Dhyani, A. Zindal, V.K. Singh and S. Chauhan, Tuning of MoS2 Particle in Al-Based Composite for Self-Lubrication, Solid-state Processing of Light Alloys (2023) 75:2949–2961.

DOI: 10.1007/s11837-023-05738-1

Google Scholar

[26] S.R. Biswal and S. Sahoo, Self-lubricating Composite: A New Generation Metal Metrix Composite for Efficient Tribological Application, Proc. of ICPCM 2021 (2023).

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-99-5509-1_14

Google Scholar

[27] M. Abbas, S. Kumar, A. Mittal, Optimization of cutting parameters to improve surface roughness of Al1070 in turning operation using Taguchi method, International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology (2016) pp.1324-1329.

Google Scholar

[28] T.U. Siddiqui and R. Mittal, Mechanical and Tribological Characterization of Al1070 Alloy Based Self-Lubricating Metal Matrix Composites, Materials today: Proc (2023).

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.667

Google Scholar

[29] P.L. Menezes, P.K. Rohatgi and M.R. Lovel, Self-Lubricating Behavior of Graphite Reinforced Metal Matrix Composites, Chapter in Green Tribology (2012) 445–480.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23681-5_17

Google Scholar

[30] A. Baradeswaran and A. Elaya Perumal, Influence of B4C on the tribological and mechanical properties of Al 7075–B4C composites, Comp: Part B (2013) 54: 146-152.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.05.012

Google Scholar

[31] A. Aatthisugan, R. Rose and D.S. Jebadurai, Mechanical and wear behaviour of AZ91D magnesium matrix hybrid composite reinforced with boron carbide and graphite, J. Magnes. Alloys (2017) 5: 20-25.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jma.2016.12.004

Google Scholar

[32] P. Kumar P, B.P. Vijay Kumar, R. Joshi, T.H. Manjunatha, R. Sureshkumar, Valuation of Al7075 Reinforced with SiC for its Mechanical Properties & Surface Roughness by Drilling, Materials Today: Proceedings (2018) 5, 11(3): 25121-25129.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.10.313

Google Scholar

[33] K.P. Furlan, J.D.B. De Mello, A.N.K. Klein, Self-lubricating composites containing MoS2: A review, Tribo Int (2018) 120: 280-298.

DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2017.12.033

Google Scholar

[34] P. Kumar, SS Panda, Numerical simulation of Al1070 Alloy through hybrid SDP process, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol 91, pp.835-846 (2016).

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-016-9768-9

Google Scholar

[35] V.S. Srivastava, T.K. Gupta, A.K. Srivastava, S. Chauhan, P.K. Chauhan, Effects of cutting parameters on aluminium alloys-A review, Materials today: Proceedings, Vol 47(13), pp.3823-3827 (2021).

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.091

Google Scholar

[36] T. Gutowski, The carbon and energy intensity of manufacturing. 40th CIRP International Manufacturing Systems, Seminar. Liverpool University, UK (2007) 1–6.

Google Scholar

[37] M.F. Rajemi, P.T. Mativenga, A. Aramcharoen, Sustainable machining: selection of optimum turning conditions based on minimum energy considerations. J Clean Prod (2010) 18:1059–65.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.025

Google Scholar

[38] S. Hu, F. Liu, Y. He and T. Hu, An on-line approach for energy efficiency monitoring of machine tools. J Clean Prod (2012) 27:133–40.

Google Scholar

[39] www.energybangla.com

Google Scholar

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For open access content, terms of the Creative Commons licensing CC-BY are applied.
Scientific.Net is a registered trademark of Trans Tech Publications Ltd.