Assessment of Interfacial Adhesion of Adhesively Bonded 3D-Printed Thermoplastics

Article Preview

Abstract:

The aim of this study is to evaluate the interfacial adhesion of Fused Deposition Model (FDM)-printed Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and Polylactic acid (PLA) bonded using commercially – available epoxy and elastomeric bonding agents. An adhesive was applied to the 3D printed specimen to quantify the interfacial resistance, the surface was then examined under an optical microscope in order to assess the reaction of the polymer to the adhesives. The results reported in the present work allow the conclusion of levels of bond improvement in the polymers.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1005)

Pages:

157-165

Citation:

Online since:

August 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Dizon, J.R.C., Espera, A.H., Chen, Q., Advincula, R.C. Mechanical characterization of 3-D printed polymers. (2018).

Google Scholar

[2] Xu, R.L., Leguillion, D. Dual Notch Void Model to Explain the Anisotropic Strengths of 3D Printed Polymers. Submitted to Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology (2019).

DOI: 10.1115/1.4044282

Google Scholar

[3] Tranchard, S., Rojas, V., Manufacturing our 3D Printed Future. (2015).

Google Scholar

[4] Arivazhagan, A., Masoo, S.H. (2012) Mechanical Properties of ABS Material Processed b Fused Deposition Modelling: submitted to International Journal of Engineering Research Application. (2012).

Google Scholar

[5] Klein, P.W. Fundamentals of Plastic Thermoforming. Morgan and Claypool. (2009).

Google Scholar

[6] Caulfield, B., McHugh, P.E., Lohfeld, S. Dependence of mechanical properties of polyamide Components on build parameters in the SLS process. J.Mater. Process Technology. (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.09.007

Google Scholar

[7] L.D. Tijing, J.R.C. Dizon, I. Ibrahim, H.Y. Shon, A.N. Nisay, R.C. Advincula, 3D printing for membrane separation, desalination and water treatment. Applied Materials Today (in press), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2019.100486.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apmt.2019.100486

Google Scholar

[8] A.D. Valino, J.R.C. Dizon, A.H. Espera Jr, Q. Chen, J. Messman, R.C. Advincula, Advances in 3D Printing of Thermoplastic Polymer Composites and Nanocomposites, Progress in Polymer Science, 101162.

DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101162

Google Scholar

[9] J.R.C. Dizon, Q. Chen, A.D. Valino, R.C. Advincula, Thermo-mechanical and swelling properties of three-dimensional-printed poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate/silica nanocomposites. MRS Communications. 9, 209-217 (2019).

DOI: 10.1557/mrc.2018.188

Google Scholar

[10] J.R.C. Dizon, A.D. Valino, L.R. Souza, A.H. Espera, Jr., Q.Chen, R.C. Advincula, Three Dimensional-Printed Molds and Materials for Injection Molding and Rapid Tooling Applications, MRS Communications, Vol Communications, Vol. 9, 2019, p.1267 – 1283, https://doi.org/10.1557/mrc.2019.147.

DOI: 10.1557/mrc.2019.147

Google Scholar

[11] A.H. Espera, J.R.C. Dizon, Q. Chen, and R.C. Advincula, 3D-printing and advanced manufacturing for electronics. Progress in Additive Manufacturing. https://doi.org/1007/ s40964-019-00077-7.

DOI: 10.1007/s40964-019-00077-7

Google Scholar

[12] Al C. De Leon, Qiyi Chen, Napolabel B. Palaganas, Jerome O. Palaganas, Jill Z. Manapat, Rigoberto C. Advincula, Highperformance polymer nanocomposites for additive manufacturing applications, React. Funct. Polym. 103 (2016) 141–155.

DOI: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2016.04.010

Google Scholar

[13] Henke, K., Treml, S. Wood based bulk material in 3D printing processes for application in construction (2013).

Google Scholar

[14] Ivanova, O., William C., Campbell, T. Additive Manufacturing and Nanotechnology: promises and challenges (2013).

Google Scholar

[15] Stansbury, J., Idacavage, M. 3D printing with polymers: challenges among expanding options and opportunities. Dent. Mater. (2016).

DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.018

Google Scholar

[16] Ahn. S., Montero, M., Odell, D., Roundy, S., Wright, P.K., Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modelling ABS. Rapid Prototyping. (2002).

DOI: 10.1108/13552540210441166

Google Scholar

[17] Stark, M. Improving and Understanding Inter-filament Bonding in 3D – printed polymers. University of Tennessee, Knoxville. (2016).

Google Scholar

[18] Alafaghani, A., Qattawi, A., Alrawi, B., Guzman, A. Experimental Optimization of Fused Deposition Modelling Processing Parameters: A Design for Manufacturing Approach. (2017).

DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.079

Google Scholar

[19] Bellini, A., Guceri, S. Mechanical characterization of parts fabricated using fused deposition modeling. Rapid Prototyping. (2003).

DOI: 10.1108/13552540310489631

Google Scholar

[20] Wagari, A., Lemu, H., Influence of 3D Printing FDM Process Parameters on Tensile Property of ULTEM 9085. University of Stavanger. (2018).

DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.047

Google Scholar

[21] Christiyan, K.J., Chandrasekhar, U., Venkateswarlu, K. A study on the influence of process parameters on the mechanical properties of 3D printed ABS composite. (2016).

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/114/1/012109

Google Scholar

[22] Chacon, J.M., Caminero, M.A., Garcia – Plaza, E., Nunez, P.J., Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: Effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.065

Google Scholar

[23] Durgun, I., Ertan, I., Experimental investigation of FDM process for improvement of mechanical properties and production cost. (2014).

DOI: 10.1108/rpj-10-2012-0091

Google Scholar

[24] Wu, W., Geng, P. Li, G., Zhao, D., Zhang, H., Zhao, J. Influence of layer thickness and raster angle on the mechanical properties of 3D – printed PEEK and a comparative mechanical study between PEEK and ABS.

DOI: 10.3390/ma8095271

Google Scholar

[25] Ford SLN. Additive Manufacturing Technology: Potential Implications for US Manufacturing Competitiveness (2014).

Google Scholar

[26] Liacouras, P., Garnes, J., Roman, N. Designing and Manufacturing an auricular prosthesis using computed tomography, 3-dimensional photographic imaging, and additive manufacturing: a clinical report. J ProsthetDent. (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(11)60002-4

Google Scholar

[27] Eckelman CA, Gardner DJ., Neivandt, DJ. Surface treatments of wood – plastic composites (WPCS) to improve adhesion. J Adhes Sci Technol. (2006).

DOI: 10.1163/156856106779116623

Google Scholar

[28] Kinloch, A.J., Lau, C.C., Williams, J.G. The peeling of flexible laminates. International Journal of Fracture. (1994).

Google Scholar

[29] Castagnetti, D., Dragoni, E., Spaggiari., A. Failure analysis of bonded T-peel joints: Efficient modelling by standard finite elements with experimental validation (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.10.004

Google Scholar

[30] Butt, J., Mebrahtu, H., Shirvani, H. Peel and tensile test investigation of aluminum 1050 foil parts made with a new additive manufacturing process. (2015).

DOI: 10.1504/ijrapidm.2015.073550

Google Scholar