Determination of Integrated Safety of High-Risk Structures According to Criteria of Acceptable and Manageable Risks

Abstract:

The paper considers the transition from traditional methods and systems for determining the standard and limit states of potentially dangerous objects by criteria of strength, resource and reliability to new perspective methods for assessing the risks of managing them. The conditions for ensuring the complex safety and security of the equipment and high-risk structures by the criteria of acceptable and managed risks are determined. It is established that the level of risk for assessing the safety status of a potentially dangerous object is defined as a probabilistic measure of the occurrence of man-made or natural phenomena, which are accompanied by the formation and action of harmful factors, as well as inflicted social, environmental, economic and other kinds of losses.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 1006)
• Pages: 143-148
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.1006.143
• Online since: August 2020
• Authors: Sergiy Azarov, Sergiy Yeremenko, Roman Shevchenko*, Stanislav Shcherbak, Viktor Mashkov
• Keywords: Complex Safety, Criteria of Strength, Emergency Situation, Potentially Dangerous Objects

References

[1] S.I. Azarov, V.L. Sidorenko, Analiz bezpeki potencijno nebezpechnih ob'yektiv, Naukovo-tehnichnij zhurnal «TEHNOGENNO-EKOLOGIChNA BEZPEKA». 1 (2017) 3-7 [in Ukrainian].

[2] O.S. Zadunaj, S.I. Azarov, Rozrobka metodologiyi analizu sistemnih rizikiv pid chas ekspluataciyi ob'yektiv pidvishenoyi ekologichnoyi nebezpeki, Naukove periodichne vidannya «Sistemi upravlinnya, navigaciyi ta zv'yazku». 1(41) (2017) 132-134 [in Ukrainian].

[3] Han, Ruicong & Yu, Yan & Zhao, Xuefeng & Peng, Deli & Guan, Quanhua & Li, Mingchu & Ou, Jinping, Emergency Communication and Quick Seismic Damage Investigation Based on Smartphone. (2016). V001T05A013. 10.1115/SMASIS2016-9094.

DOI: 10.1155/2016/7456182

[4] G.P. Cimellaro, G. Scura, C.S. Renschler, A.M. Reinhorn, and H.U. Kim, Rapid building damage assessment system using mobile phone technology. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration. 13 (3) (2014) 519–533.

DOI: 10.1007/s11803-014-0259-4

[5] A. Kokangül, U. Polat, C. Dağsuyu, A new approximation for risk assessment using the AHP and Fine Kinney methodologies, Safety science. 91 (2017) 24-32.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.07.015

[6] Zhang, X & Xiao, Yan & Kunnath, S.K., State of the art and prospect of research on fire resistance behavior of reinforced concrete columns. 24 (2015) 120-131. 10.13577/j.jnd.2015.0316.

[7] H. Liao, G. Si, Z. Xu, H. Fujita, Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Utility Set and Its Application in Selection of Fire Rescue Plans. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 15 (2018) 664.

DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15040664

[8] S.I. Azarov, O.V. Taranovskij, Metod upravlinnya rizikami pri ekspluataciyi atomnih elekrostancij. XI Mizhnarodna naukovo-praktichna konferenciya Suchasni problemi naukovogo zabezpechennya energetiki. (2013) Kiyiv, NTTU KPI, [in Ukrainian].

[9] M. Zoltan Kovacs, Probabilistic Safety Assessment of WWER440. Reactors Prediction, Quantification and Management of the Risk. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, (2014) 306.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-08548-7_6