Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Banana Fibers Reinforcement in Different Thermoset Matrix Composites

Article Preview

Abstract:

Banana fibers are among the natural lignocellulosic fibers with greater potential for use as reinforcement in polymer matrix composites. Attractive mechanical and physical properties as well as low cost of production are considered as the main advantages on the use of such fibers. This works aims to study the mechanical behavior of the banana fiber when used as filler to the two most commonly used thermoset matrices (epoxy and polyester). The specimens were produced with up to 30 vol% of banana fibers for both polymeric matrices. Tensile strength tests as well as macroscopic and microscopic evaluation of the fractured surface were carried out. It was shown that, indeed, the banana fiber provided a substantial reinforcement for both matrices. On the other hand, mechanical strength associated with the composite epoxy/banana was more than 50% higher than the exhibit by the polyester/banana one. Such behavior could be associated with the interfacial strength regarding the fiber and the matrix.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

[1] N. Saba, M. Jawaid, O.Y. Alothman, M.T. Paridah: Construction and Building Materials Vol. 106 (2016), p.149.

Google Scholar

[2] S.N. Monteiro, F.M. Margem, R.L. Loiola, F.S. Assis, M.P. Oliveira: Materials Science Forum Vols. 775-776 (2014), p.250.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.775-776.250

Google Scholar

[3] S.N. Monteiro, F.M. Margem, R.L. Loiola, F.S. Assis, M.P. Oliveira: Materials Science Forum Vols. 775-776 (2014), p.261.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.775-776.261

Google Scholar

[4] W.D. Callister, D.G. Rethwisch: Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction. (John Wiley & Sons 8th ed. Danvers 2012).

Google Scholar

[5] K.G. Satyanarayana, J.L. Guimarães, F. Wypych: Compos. Part A Vol. 38 (2007), p.1694.

Google Scholar

[6] N. Saba, M.T. Paridah, M. Jawaid: Constr. Build. Mater. Vol. 76 (2010), p.87.

Google Scholar

[7] F.C. Garcia Filho, S.N. Monteiro: JOM (2018).

Google Scholar

[8] F.M. Margem, S.N. Monteiro, J.B. Neto, R.J.S. Rodriguez, B. Guenther Soares: Rev. Mat. Vol. 15 (2010), p.167.

Google Scholar

[9] S.N. Monteiro, T.L. Milanezi, L.H.L. Louro, E.P. Lima Jr, F.O. Braga, A.V. Gomes, J.W. Drelich: Materials & Design Vol. 96 (2016), p.263.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.024

Google Scholar

[10] A. Deb, S. Das, A. Mache, R. Laishram: Procedia Engineering Vol. 173 (2017), p.631.

Google Scholar

[11] F.S. Assis, A.C. Pereira, F.C. Garcia Filho, E.P. Lima Jr, S.N. Monteiro, R.P. Weber: Journal of Materials Research and Technology Vol. 7(4) (2018), p.535.

Google Scholar

[12] S.N. Monteiro: Natural Fibers Vol. 6 2) (2008), p.191.

Google Scholar

[13] A.V. Ratna Prasad, K. Mohana Rao: Materials & Design Vol. 32 (8-9) (2011), p.4658.

Google Scholar

[14] F.O. Braga, L.T. Bolzan, F.J.H.T.V. Ramos, S.N. Monteiro, E.P. Lima Jr.:Materials Research-Ibero-American Journal of Materials Vol. 20 (2018), p.767.

Google Scholar

[15] ASTM D638 – 02a. Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics (2003).

Google Scholar

[16] O. Güven, S.N. Monteiro, E.A.B. Moura, J.W. Drelich: Polym. Review Vol. 56 (2016), p.706.

Google Scholar

[17] M.R. Sanjay, P. Madhu, M. Jawaid, P. Senthamarakannan, S. Senthil, S. Pradeep: J. Cleaner Production Vol. 172 (2018), p.566.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.101

Google Scholar