Polyamide 6.6 Degradation through Photo-Fenton Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

Synthetic polymers have become essential in our life, nevertheless, the high production and the low recycling around the world have caused serious problems of contamination in soil and water. In addition, its fragmentation into microplastics in environmental conditions has exacerbated the ecological problems due to its possible ingestion by organisms and its high capacity to transport and release a wide variety of organic pollutants. Photo-Fenton process was used to evaluated its capacity to degrade PA6.6 microplastic under simulated solar irradiation and natural solar irradiation plus LED visible light in order to get a best knowledge about its behavior in environmental conditions. PA6.6 was degraded for 7 h through photo-Fenton process under simulated solar irradiation. Superficial defects were observed along the PA6.6 microplastic after degradation experiments. However, FT-IR analysis did not show the formation of additional bands which indicated the formation of new products. DSC analysis showed changes in the melting point of the PA6.6 after the photo-Fenton treatment at different times. The assays carried out under natural solar irradiation showed lower degradation of the PA6.6 under the same experimental conditions, nevertheless, it was observed an increase of the specific surface area 90 times higher in the PA6.6 treated for 10 h.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1063)

Pages:

243-252

Citation:

Online since:

June 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Information on https://www.plasticseurope.org/en/resources/publications/4312-plastics-facts-(2020).

Google Scholar

[2] S. Chatterjee, S. Sharma, Microplastics in our oceans and marine health, F. Actions Sci. Rep. 19 (2019) 54–61.

Google Scholar

[3] B. Worm, H. K. Lotze, I. Jubinville, C. Wilcox, J. Jambeck, Plastic as a Persistent Marine Pollutant, Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 42 (2017) 1–26.

DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-060700

Google Scholar

[4] S. Wolff, J. Kerpen, J. Prediger, L. Barkmann, L. Müller, Determination of the microplastics emission in the effluent of a municipal waste water treatment plant using Raman microspectroscopy, Water Res. X, 2 (2019) 100014.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wroa.2018.100014

Google Scholar

[5] H. S. Auta, C. U. Emenike, S. H. Fauziah, Distribution and importance of microplastics in the marine environment: A review of the sources, fate, effects, and potential solutions, Environ. Int., 102 (2017) 165–176.

DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2017.02.013

Google Scholar

[6] H. S. Auta, C. U. Emenike, S. H. Fauziah, Screening of Bacillus strains isolated from mangrove ecosystems in Peninsular Malaysia for microplastic degradation, Environ. Pollut. 231 (2017) 1552–1559.

DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.043

Google Scholar

[7] K. Zhang, A. H. Hamidian, A. Tubić, Y. Zhang, J. K. H. Fang, C. Wu, P. K. S. Lam , Understanding plastic degradation and microplastic formation in the environment: A review, Environ. Pollut. 274 (2021) 116554.

DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116554

Google Scholar

[8] A. A. Horton, D. K. A. Barnes, Microplastic pollution in a rapidly changing world: Implications for remote and vulnerable marine ecosystems, Sci. Total Environ. 738 (2020) 140349.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140349

Google Scholar

[9] H. Zang, J. Zhou, M. R. Marshall, D. R. Chadwick, Y. Wen, D. L. Jones, Microplastics in the agroecosystem: Are they an emerging threat to the plant-soil system?, Soil Biol. Biochem. 148 (2020) 107926.

DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107926

Google Scholar

[10] M. Lehtiniemi, S. Hartikainen, P. Näkki, J. Engström-Öst, A. Koistinen, O. Setälä, Size matters more than shape: Ingestion of primary and secondary microplastics by small predators, Food Webs. 17 (2018) e00097.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fooweb.2018.e00097

Google Scholar

[11] C. Wang, J. Zhao, B. Xing, Environmental source, fate, and toxicity of microplastics, J. Hazard. Mater. 407 (2020) 124357.

Google Scholar

[12] Y. Xiang, L. Jiang, Y. Zhou, Z. Lou, D. Zhi, J. Yang, S. S. Lam, Microplastics and environmental pollutants: Key interaction and toxicology in aquatic and soil environments, J. Hazard. Mater. 422 (2021) 126843.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126843

Google Scholar

[13] Y. Deng, R. Zhao, Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs) in Wastewater Treatment, Curr. Pollut. Reports. 1 (2015) 167–176.

DOI: 10.1007/s40726-015-0015-z

Google Scholar

[14] A. Bakir, S. J. Rowland, R. C. Thompson, Transport of persistent organic pollutants by microplastics in estuarine conditions, Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 140 (2014) 14–21.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2014.01.004

Google Scholar

[15] D. Feldman, Polyamide nanocomposites, J. Macromol. Sci. Part A Pure Appl. Chem. 54 (2017) 255–262.

Google Scholar

[16] J. Friedrich, P. Zalar, M. Mohorčič, U. Klun, A. Kržan, Ability of fungi to degrade synthetic polymer nylon-6, Chemosphere. 67 (2007) 2089–(2095).

DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.09.038

Google Scholar

[17] N. Yamano, N. Kawasaki, S. Ida, A. Nakayama, Biodegradation of polyamide 4 in seawater, Polym. Degrad. Stab. 166 (2019) 230–236.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2019.05.032

Google Scholar

[18] L. Zhao, C. Su, W. Liu, R. Qin, L. Tang, X. Deng, S. Wu, M. Chen, Exposure to polyamide 66 microplastic leads to effects performance and microbial community structure of aerobic granular sludge, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 190 (2019) 110070.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.110070

Google Scholar

[19] J. M. Lee, R. Busquets, I. C. Choi, S. H. Lee, J. K. Kim, L. C. Campos, Photocatalytic degradation of polyamide 66: Evaluating the feasibility of photocatalysis as a microfibre-targeting technology, Water (Switzerland). 12 (2020) 1–20.

DOI: 10.3390/w12123551

Google Scholar

[20] L. Sørensen, A. S. Groven, I. A. Hovsbakken, O. Del Puerto, D. F. Krause, A. Sarno, A. N. Booth, UV degradation of natural and synthetic microfibers causes fragmentation and release of polymer degradation products and chemical additives, Sci. Total Environ. 755 (2021) 143170.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143170

Google Scholar

[21] N. Vasanthan, D. R. Salem, Structure characterization of heat set and drawn polyamide 66 fibers by FTIR spectroscopy, Mater. Res. Innov. 4 (2001) 155–160.

DOI: 10.1007/pl00010782

Google Scholar

[22] P. N. Thanki, R. P. Singh, Photo-oxidative degradation of nylon 66 under accelerated weathering, Polymer (Guildf). 39 (1998) 6363–6367.

DOI: 10.1016/s0032-3861(97)10390-1

Google Scholar

[23] J. Charles, G. R. Ramkumaar, S. Azhagiri, S. Gunasekaran, FTIR and thermal studies on nylon-66 and 30% glass fibre reinforced nylon-66, E-Journal Chem. 6 (2009) 23–33.

DOI: 10.1155/2009/909017

Google Scholar

[24] F. Navarro-Pardo, G. Martínez-Barrera, A. L. Martínez-Hernández, V. M. Castaño, J. L. Rivere-Armenta, F. Medellín-Rodríguez, C. Velasco-Santos, Effects on the thermo-mechanical and crystallinity properties of nylon 6,6 electrospun fibres reinforced with one dimensional (1D) and two dimensional (2D) carbon, Materials (Basel). 6 (2013) 3494–3513.

DOI: 10.3390/ma6083494

Google Scholar

[25] A. M. Pannase, R. K. Singh, B. Ruj, P. Gupta, Decomposition of polyamide via slow pyrolysis: Effect of heating rate and operating temperature on product yield and composition, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 151 (2020) 104886.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2020.104886

Google Scholar

[26] L. A. Díaz-Alejo, E. C. Menchaca-Campos, J. Uruchurtu Chavarín, R. Sosa-Fonseca, M. A. García-Sánchez, Effects of the addition of ortho - And para NH2 substituted tetraphenylporphyrins on the structure of nylon 66, Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2013 (2013) 1-14.

DOI: 10.1155/2013/323854

Google Scholar

[27] N. Vasanthan, Crystallinity determination of nylon 66 by density measurement and fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, J. Chem. Educ. 89 (2012) 387–390.

DOI: 10.1021/ed200398m

Google Scholar

[28] G. Zhang, T. Watanabe, H. Yoshida, T. Kawai, Phase transition behavior of nylon-66, nylon-48, and blends, Polym. J. 35 (2003) 173–177.

DOI: 10.1295/polymj.35.173

Google Scholar

[29] A. Dawelbeit, M. Yu, Transient Confinement of the Quaternary Tetramethylammonium Tetrafluoroborate Salt in Nylon 6 , 6 Fibres : Structural Developments for High Performance Properties, Materials, 14 (2021) 2938.

DOI: 10.3390/ma14112938

Google Scholar

[30] Information on https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK304366/.

Google Scholar

[31] S. Dominguez, P. Ribao, M. J. Rivero, I. Ortiz, Influence of radiation and TiO2 concentration on the hydroxyl radicals generation in a photocatalytic LED reactor. Application to dodecylbenzenesulfonate degradation, Appl. Catal. B Environ. 178 (2014) 165–169.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.09.072

Google Scholar

[32] S. Yurdakal, C. Garlisi, L. Özcan, M. Bellardita, and G. Palmisano, (Photo)catalyst characterization techniques: Adsorption isotherms and BET, SEM, FTIR, UV-Vis, photoluminescence, and electrochemical characterizations, in: G. Marcì, L. Palmisano (Eds.), Heterogeneous Photocatalysis Relationships with Heterogeneous Catalysis and Perspectives, Elsevier, 2019, pp.87-152.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-64015-4.00004-3

Google Scholar