Comparative Study of Quench and Partition Processes in High Si and High Al Steels

Article Preview

Abstract:

The quench and partition process is a means to develop third-generation high-strength steels using many possible process variants. In this work, two variants of quench and partitioning heat treatments, one-step and two-step, were carried out for high Si and high Al steel alloys. The kinetics of isothermal transformation occurring during the one-step quench and partition process were analysed using dilatometry. Experimental analysis revealed the swing-back phenomenon in high Si steel, and the transformation characteristics above and below the Ms temperature differed. The high Al alloy resulted in higher retained austenite (19%) compared to high Si steel (17%) during the one-step quench and partition process. Aluminium addition favoured bainite formation more than silicon addition. A comparison of two heat treatment variants shows the two-step quench and partition heat treatment seemed preferable as it produced more retained austenite (22%) in the high Si steel.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1105)

Pages:

99-104

Citation:

Online since:

November 2023

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2023 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Lesch C, Kwiaton N, Klose FB. Advanced High Strength Steels (AHSS) for Automotive Applications − Tailored Properties by Smart Microstructural Adjustments. Vol. 88, Steel Research International. Wiley-VCH Verlag; 2017.

DOI: 10.1002/srin.201700210

Google Scholar

[2] Matlock D, G. Speer J. Third Generation of AHSS: Microstructure Design Concepts. In 2009. p.185–205.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84882-454-6_11

Google Scholar

[3] Speer J, Matlock DK, De Cooman BC, Schroth JG. Carbon partitioning into austenite after martensite transformation. Acta Mater. 2003;51(9): p.2611–22.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6454(03)00059-4

Google Scholar

[4] Speer JG, Rizzo FC, Matlock DK, Edmonds D V. The "quenching and partitioning" process: background and recent progress. Mater Res. 2006 Dec;8(4): p.417–23.

DOI: 10.1590/s1516-14392005000400010

Google Scholar

[5] Gomez M, Garcia C, M. Haezebrouck D, Deardo A. Design of composition in (Al/Si)-alloyed TRIP steels. ISIJ INT. 2009 Jan 1;49:p.302–11.

DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.49.302

Google Scholar

[6] De Moor E, Lacroix S, Samek L, Penning J, G Speer J. Dilatometric Study of the Quench and Partitioning Process. Korea. 2006 Sep 22-26

Google Scholar

[7] David WIF. Powder diffraction: Least-squares and beyond. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol. 2004;109(1):107.

DOI: 10.6028/jres.109.008

Google Scholar

[8] Van Dijk NH, Butt AM, Zhao L, Sietsma J, Offerman SE, Wright JP, et al. Thermal stability of retained austenite in TRIP steels studied by synchrotron X-ray diffraction during cooling. Acta Mater. 2005;53(20):p.5439–47.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.08.017

Google Scholar

[9] Van Bohemen SMC, Morsdorf L. Predicting the Ms temperature of steels with a thermodynamic-based model including the effect of the prior austenite grain size. Acta Mater. 2017;125:p.401–15.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.029

Google Scholar

[10] Kim DH, Speer JG, Kim HS, De Cooman BC. Observation of an Isothermal Transformation during Quenching and Partitioning Processing. Metall Mater Trans A. 2009;40(9):p.2048–60.

DOI: 10.1007/s11661-009-9891-4

Google Scholar

[11] Kumar S, Singh SB. Evolution of microstructure during the "quenching and partitioning (Q&P)" treatment. Materialia. 2021;18:101135.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mtla.2021.101135

Google Scholar