For Libraries For Publication Open Access Downloads About Us Contact Us
Paper Titles
Preface
Direct Detection of Green-Synthesized Fe3O4 Magnetic Nanotag Using Double-Chip Configuration of Commercial Giant Magnetoresistance Sensor
p.3
Detection of Green-Synthesized Fe3O4/ Chitosan Using Spin Valve GMR Sensor with Wheatstone Bridge Circuit
p.9
Enhanced Magnetic Properties of Gd-Doped ZnO by Varying the Gd Concentration via Co-Sputtering Technique
p.15
Green Synthesis of Magnetite Nanoparticles Using Moringa oleifera and their Electro-Optic Surface Plasmon Resonance Properties
p.21
Production of Bone Cement Composite from Polymethyl Methacrylate Produced in Laboratory Scale
p.29
The Effectiveness of Hydroxyapatite as a Filler in Denture Base Materials Based on Polymethyl Methacrylate to Improving Mechanical Properties
p.37
The Comparison of Polyethersulfone (PES)/N-Methyl 2-Pyrrolidone (NMP) on the Fabrication of Hollow Fiber Membranes with Commercial Membranes for Applications Hemodialysis
p.43
Characterization of Composite Films from Taro Starch Modified with the Addition of Duck Bone Gelatin
p.53

Green Synthesis of Magnetite Nanoparticles Using Moringa oleifera and their Electro-Optic Surface Plasmon Resonance Properties

Article Preview

Abstract:

The application of an external electric field to the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) system of green-synthesized magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles (MNPs) is very promising for increasing the SPR detection signal. Electro-optic surface plasmon resonance (EOSPR) behavior of MNPs has been successfully carried out. The EOSPR system was investigated using the Kretschmann configuration with the prism/Au thin film/MNPs/air layer arrangement and applying an electric voltage of 0 V, 2 V, 4 V, and 6 V. In this study, we synthesized MNPs using the green synthesis approach from moringa oleifera extract. The benefits of green synthesis include being safe, affordable, clean, and ecologically friendly processes. X-ray diffraction results obtained crystal size of the MNPs is about 9.2 nm with inverse spinel face-centered cubic crystal structure. Fourier transforms infrared characterization showed the presence of Fe-O bonds at wave numbers 569 cm-1 and 629 cm-1, indicating that MNPs were successfully formed. The saturation magnetization of the samples is 55.3 emu/g. The SPR angle of the SPR system Prism/Au thin film/air without the addition of MNPs is 44.66°. After being deposited by MNPs and induced by a voltage of 0 V, 2 V, 4 V, and 6 V, the SPR angles changed to 44.87°, 44.90°, 44.95° and 45.12°. The addition of MNPs and an external electric field causes the SPR angle to increase. The results of this study can provide new insights into the development of optical devices that can be manipulated electrically and have the potential for future biosensor applications.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
5th International Conference on Nanomaterials, Materials and Manufacturing Engineering & 7th International Conference on Sensors, Materials and Manufacturing View Preview
Polymers, Composites, Nano- and Bio- Materials View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1114)

Pages:

21-26

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/p-l9rTIG

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

February 2024

Authors:

Sari Wahyuni, Muhammad Riswan, Rivaldo Marsel Tumbelaka, Rona Cuana, Nurul Imani Istiqomah, Edi Suharyadi*

Keywords:

Electro-Optic, Green Synthesis, Magnetite, Moringa oleifera, Nanoparticles, Surface Plasmon Resonance

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2024 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] F. Eslami-Kaliji, S.Z. Mirahmadi-Zare, S. Nazem, N. Shafie, R. Ghaedi, M. hossein Asadian-esfahani, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 217 (2022) 142–149.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.07.035

Google Scholar

[2] J. Wang, F. Wang, H. Chen, X. Liu, S. Dong, Talanta 75 (2008) 666–670.

Google Scholar

[3] A. Philip, A.R. Kumar, Coord. Chem. Rev. 458 (2022) 214424.

Google Scholar

[4] X. Guo, Sensors Actuators B. Chem. 205 (2014) 276–280.

Google Scholar

[5] X. Liu, Y. Hu, S. Zheng, Y. Liu, Z. He, F. Luo, Sensors Actuators B. Chem. 230 (2016) 191–198.

Google Scholar

[6] M. Oktivina, D.T. Nurrohman, R. A N Q Z, E. Suharyadi, K. Abraha, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 202 (2017).

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/202/1/012077

Google Scholar

[7] H. Chugh, D. Sood, I. Chandra, V. Tomar, G. Dhawan, R. Chandra, Artif. Cells, Nanomedicine Biotechnol. 46 (2018) 1210–1220.

DOI: 10.1080/21691401.2018.1449118

Google Scholar

[8] M. Khatami, H.Q. Alijani, M.S. Nejad, R.S. Varma, Appl. Sci. 8 (2018) 1–17.

Google Scholar

[9] S. Forruque, M. Mofijur, N. Rafa, A. Tasnim, S. Chowdhury, M. Nahrin, A.B.M.S. Islam, H. Chyuan, Environ. Res. 204 (2022) 111967.

Google Scholar

[10] T.A. Saleh, G. Fadillah, Trends Enviromental Anal. Chem. 39 (2023) 1–23.

Google Scholar

[11] S. Altaf, R. Zafar, W.Q. Zaman, S. Ahmad, K. Yaqoob, A. Syed, A.J. Khan, M. Bilal, M. Arshad, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 226 (2021) 112826.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112826

Google Scholar

[12] M.M. Kgatitsoe, S. Ncube, H. Tutu, I.A. Nyambe, L. Chimuka, J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 7 (2019) 103128.

Google Scholar

[13] B. Vongsak, P. Sithisarn, S. Mangmool, Ind. Crop. Prod. 44 (2013) 566–571.

Google Scholar

[14] V. Lioubimov, A. Kolomenskii, A. Mershin, D. V. Nanopoulos, H.A. Schuessler, Appl. Opt. 43 (2004) 3426–3432.

DOI: 10.1364/ao.43.003426

Google Scholar

[15] T.J. Wang, P.C. Ho, J. Appl. Phys. 109 (2011).

Google Scholar

[16] S. Gupta, A. Paliwal, V. Gupta, M. Tomar, Appl. Surf. Sci. 458 (2018) 139–144.

Google Scholar

[17] H.H. Kyaw, S. Boonruang, W.S. Mohammed, AIP Adv. 5 (2015) 107226.

Google Scholar

[18] X. Tian, Z. Fang, F. Zheng, Z. Ma, W. Gao, G. Shi, D. Fu, W. Ye, Y. Qin, Y. Zhang, Ceram. Int. (2023) 8–15.

Google Scholar

[19] K.C. Chu, C.Y. Chao, Y.F. Chen, Y.C. Wu, C.C. Chen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 (2006) 2012–2015.

Google Scholar

[20] S. Gupta, A. Paliwal, V. Gupta, M. Tomar, Opt. Laser Technol. 137 (2021) 106816.

Google Scholar

[21] R. Cuana, A.M. Panre, N.I. Istiqomah, R.M. Tumbelaka, Sunaryono, S.T. Wicaksono, E. Suharyadi, ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 11 (2022) 083015.

DOI: 10.1149/2162-8777/ac8b36

Google Scholar

[22] E.R. Monazam, R.W. Breault, R. Siriwardane, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 53 (2014) 13320–13328.

Google Scholar

[23] B. Kayode, O. Abu, A. Abdul, M. Katsikini, J. Alloys Compd. 938 (2023) 168558.

Google Scholar

[24] R. Rahmawati, M.G. Permana, B. Harison, Nugraha, B. Yuliarto, Suyatman, D. Kurniadi, Procedia Eng. 170 (2017) 55–59.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.010

Google Scholar

[25] S. Aliramaji, A. Zamanian, Z. Sohrabijam, Procedia Mater. Sci. 11 (2015) 265–269.

Google Scholar

[26] C. Prasad, K. Sreenivasulu, S. Gangadhara, P. Venkateswarlu, J. Alloys Compd. 700 (2017) 252–258.

Google Scholar

[27] M. Yaghoobi, F. Asjadi, M. Sanikhani, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 144 (2023) 104774.

Google Scholar

[28] Juharni, I.M. Yahya, E. Suharyadi, T. Kato, S. Iwata, Int. J. Nanoelectron. Mater. 14 (2021) 209–218.

Google Scholar

[29] I.P.T. Indrayana, M.T. Tuny, R.A. Putra, Juharni, E. Suharyadi, T. Kato, S. Iwata, JoP 5 (2020) 65–74.

Google Scholar

[30] T.J. Wang, C.C. Cheng, S.C. Yang, Appl. Phys. B Lasers Opt. 103 (2011) 701–706.

Google Scholar

[31] L. Mahmudin, M.S. Ulum, D. Farhamsa, E. Suharyadi, A.B.S. Utomo, K. Abraha, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1242 (2019).

DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1242/1/012027

Google Scholar

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For open access content, terms of the Creative Commons licensing CC-BY are applied.
Scientific.Net is a registered trademark of Trans Tech Publications Ltd.