Characterization of the Residual Stresses in Plastically Deformed Ferrite-Martensite Steels Using Barkhausen Noise Measurements

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this work, we show that the measurement of the Barkhausen noise allows the residual stresses in each of the two phases of ferrite-martensite steels to be characterized. We have first studied the effect of a tensile and a compressive stress on the Barkhausen noise signature. We observed that for a ferrite-martensite steel, the application of a tensile stress increases the Barkhausen activity of the martensite and ferrite phases, whereas a compressive one reduces it. In a second time, we induced residual stresses by applying a plastic deformation to ferrite-martensite steels. After a tensile plastic deformation, we observed that (i) compressive residual stresses appear in ferrite, and (ii) tensile residual stresses appear in martensite. An opposite behavior is observed after a compressive plastic deformation. These results show that the Barkhausen noise measurement makes it possible to highlight in a nondestructive way the distribution of the stresses in each of the two phases of a ferrite-martensite steel. This result could be used to characterize industrial Dual- Phases steels that are plastically deformed during mechanical processes.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 500-501)

Pages:

655-662

Citation:

Online since:

November 2005

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2005 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S. Tiitto: Acta Polytechnica Scandinavia: Applied Physics Series, Vol. 119 (1977).

Google Scholar

[2] Proceeding of the 4th International Conference on Barkhausen noise and micromagnetic testing, Brescia, Stresstech, (2003).

Google Scholar

[3] X. Kleber, A. Hug, J. Merlin and A. Hug: ISIJ international, Vol. 44 (2004), p.1033.

Google Scholar

[4] D.T. Llewellyn and D.J. Hillis : Ironmaking and Steelmaking, Vol. 23 (1996), p.471.

Google Scholar

[5] S. Chikazumi, Physics of magnetism: New York, (1964).

Google Scholar

[6] D.E. Scherpereel, L.L. Kazmerski and C.W. Allen: Metallurgical Transactions Vol 1 (1970), p.517.

Google Scholar

[7] C. Gatelier-Rothea, J. Chicois, R. Fougères and P. Fleischmann: Acta mater Vol. 14 (1998), p.4873.

Google Scholar

[8] H. Sakamoto, M. Okada and M. Homma: IEEE Transactions on Magnetics Vol. 23 (1987), p.2236.

Google Scholar

[9] R. Ranjan, D.C. Jiles and P.K. Rastogi: IEEE Transactions on Magnetics Vol. 23 (1987), p.1869.

Google Scholar

[10] D.C. Jiles: IEEE Transactions on Magnetics Vol. 25 (1989), p.3455.

Google Scholar

[11] X. Kleber, A. Vincent: NDT&E International Vol. 37 (2004), p.439.

Google Scholar

[12] C.G. Gardner, G.A. Matzkanin, D.L. Davidson: NDT Int C Vol. 51 (1979), p.5.

Google Scholar

[13] J. Anglada-Rivera, L.R. Padovese, J. Capo-Sanchez: J. Magn. Mater Vol. 231 (2001), p.306.

Google Scholar

[14] H. Mughrabi: Acta Metall Mater Vol. 31 (1983), p.1367.

Google Scholar