Module and Product Family Formation Based on Improved Interpretive Structure Model

Article Preview

Abstract:

The module and product family formation are the important technologies for mass customization. This paper provides a novel method of establishing the module for mass customization so that we can construct the various product families for the individuation demand. This method can obtain the driven design way of demand through the VOC (Voice of customer) report and obtain the components through the functional and structural mapping .This method accounts for the specification flow between components rather than merely the relation and similarity of the components, represents the hierarchical relations and related design constraints of the product by a structural graph and helps designers to create various product for mass customization. The methodology also is illustrated via the case study of the product family design of forklift.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 532-533)

Pages:

821-824

Citation:

Online since:

December 2006

Keywords:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S. Salhie and Kamrani: Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing Journal, Vol. 15 (1999), pp.319-329.

Google Scholar

[2] G.V. Shirly: Modular Design and the Economics of Design for Manufacturing, in Susman G. (ed. ), Integrating Design and Manufacturing for Competitive Advantage, (Oxford University Press 1995).

Google Scholar

[3] A. Kamrani and S. Salhieh: Product Design for Modularity (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000).

Google Scholar

[4] M.M. Tseng and J. Jiao: Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, (1998), DETC98/DTM-5717.

Google Scholar

[5] T.W. Simpson, J.R.A. Maier and F. Mistree: Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, (1999), DETC99/DTM-8761.

Google Scholar

[6] J.N. Warfield: Societal Systems: Planning, Policy and Complexity, Wiley, (New York, 1976).

Google Scholar

[7] J. Hauser and D. Clausing: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 66 (1988), pp.63-73.

Google Scholar

[8] J.N. Warfield: IEEE-SMC, Vol. 3 (1973), pp.121-132.

Google Scholar

[9] J.N. Warfield: A Science of Generic Design: Managing Complexity Through System Design, Vol. 1, Intersystems, Salinas, CA, (1990).

Google Scholar

[10] J.N. Warfield: A Science of Generic Design: Managing Complexity Through System Design, Vol. 2, Intersystems, Salinas, CA, (1990).

Google Scholar

[11] T. Kitamura: IEEE Transaction on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 46 (1999), pp.485-493.

Google Scholar

[12] H.D. Sharma, A.D. Gupta and Sushil: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 48 (1995), pp.285-309.

DOI: 10.1016/0040-1625(94)00066-6

Google Scholar

[13] M.H. Meyer and A.P. Lehnerd: The Power of Product Platforms (The Free Press, New York 1997).

Google Scholar