Phase-Field Simulations of Dendritic Orientation Selection in Mg-Alloys with Hexagonal Anisotropy

Article Preview

Abstract:

A special feature of Mg solidification is the anisotropy of the hexagonal closed packed lattice, which under directional growth conditions causes a strong crystallographic texture. Although this primary growth texture is in technical processes masked by subsequent solid state processes, its understanding can be helpful for efficient microstructure optimization. The aim of the present work is to study the fundamental orientation selection mechanisms by numerical simulation. For this pur-pose, a phase-field model has been extended to allow for complex 3D anisotropic interfacial ener-gies and interfacial mobilities, calibrated by data from molecular dynamics studies. The model is first applied in 3D to Mg-6%Al, revealing two major stages of texture formation. Directly after nuc-leation, all grains with basal plane parallel to the gradient direction are selected. During further competitive growth, grains with <1120> closely aligned to the temperature gradient commonly pre-vail, but process dependent also other orientations of the basal plane (between <1120> and <1010>) may coexist. The latter phenomenon is investigated in detail in 2D for the ternary alloy AZ31.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

199-204

Citation:

Online since:

May 2010

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] F. Kaiser, J. Bohlen, D. Letzig, A. Styczynski, Ch. Hartig and K.U. Kainer, Mat. Sci. Forum 419-422 (2003), p.315.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.419-422.315

Google Scholar

[2] D. Walton and B. Chalmers, Transactions of the American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers, 215 (1959), p.447.

Google Scholar

[3] P. Carter, D.C. Cox, C.A. Gandin and R.C. Reed, Materials Science and Engineering A, 280, (2000), p.233.

Google Scholar

[4] Y.Z. Zhou, A. Volek and N.R. Green, Acta Materialia, 56 (2008), p.2631.

Google Scholar

[5] P. Carter, D.C. Cox, C.A. Gandin and R.C. Reed, Materials Science and Engineering A, 280, (2000), p.233.

Google Scholar

[6] A. Semoroz, M. Rappaz and S. Henry, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 31 (2000), p.487.

Google Scholar

[7] K. Pettersen and N. Ryum, Metallurgical Transactions A, 20 (1989), p.847.

Google Scholar

[8] K. Pettersen, 0. Lohne, and N. Ryum, Metallurgical Transactions A, 21 (1990), p.221.

Google Scholar

[9] D. Mirkovic and R. Schmid-Fetzer, Inst. of Metallurgy, TU Clausthal, Cooperation in the DFG priority programme 1168.

Google Scholar

[10] J. Eiken, B. Böttger and I. Steinbach, Physical Review E, 73 (2006), 066122.

Google Scholar

[11] MICRESS, software developed at Access e.V., RWTH Aachen, www. micress. de.

Google Scholar

[12] R. Schmid-Fetzer, A. Janz, J. Gröbner and M. Ohno, Advanced Engineering Materials 7, (2005), p.1142.

Google Scholar

[13] Z. G. Xia, D. Y. Sun, M. Asta and J. J. Hoyt, Physical Review B, 75 (2007), 012103.

Google Scholar

[14] D. Y. Sun, M. I. Mendelev, C. A. Becker, K. Kudin, T. Haxhimali, M. Asta, J. Hoyt, A. Karma and D. J. Srolovitz , Physical Review B, 73 (2006), 024116.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.73.024116

Google Scholar

[15] J. Eiken, International Journal of Cast Metals Research, Proceedings of the ICASP-2 (2008), to be published.

Google Scholar