Gigacycle Fatigue Response of PM versus Ingot Metallurgy Tool Steels

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this work, the gigacycle fatigue response of several tool steel grades has been studied using an ultrasonic resonance testing device. It showed that both with ingot metallurgy (IM) and powder metallurgy (PM) tool steels, a true fatigue limit does not exist up to 10E10 cycles. PM steels resulted in significantly higher endurance strength levels than IM grades. However, there was virtually no effect of the composition and hardness of the materials, both for PM and IM grades cold work tool steels and high speed steels exhibiting virtually the same S-N curves. In the IM tool steel grades, crack initiation started at large primary carbides or carbide clusters, while in the PM grades, nonmetallic inclusions were the critical sites. In any case it is very important to avoid introducing residual stresses into the specimen surfaces during preparation, which would markedly shift the endurance strength levels.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

23-30

Citation:

Online since:

January 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. Danzer: Proc. 12th Plansee-Seminar, H. Bildstein, H.M. Ortner eds., Reutte (1989) Vol. 2.

Google Scholar

[2] C. Tornberg: Metal Powder Report 60 (2005) p.36.

Google Scholar

[3] S. Marsoner et al.: HTM 57 (2002) p.283.

Google Scholar

[4] R. Stickler, B. Weiss, J. Femböck: Proc. 12th Plansee Seminar, H. Bildstein, H.M. Ortner eds., Reutte (1989) Vol. 1, p.749.

Google Scholar

[5] B. Weiss, H. Danninger: Proc. 2000 Powder Metall. World Congress, Kyoto, K. Kosuge, H. Nagai eds., The Japan Soc. of Powder and Powder Metall. (2001) Part II, pp.1590-1593.

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Furuya et al.: Met. Mat. Trans. 34A (2003) p.2517.

Google Scholar

[7] H. Mughrabi: Fatigue Fract. Engng. Mater. Struct. 25 (2002) p.755.

Google Scholar

[8] G. Roberts, G. Krauss, R. Kennedy: Tool Steels. ASM, Materials Park OH (1998).

Google Scholar

[9] C. Sohar et al.: Kovove Materialy 46 (2008) p.197.

Google Scholar

[10] C. Sohar et al.: Mat. -wiss. u. Werkstofftech. 2008, 39, p.248.

Google Scholar

[11] R. Stickler, B. Weiss, in: Ultrasonic Fatigue, TMS-AIME, Warrendale PA (1982) 135.

Google Scholar

[12] C. Sohar et al.: Int. J. Fatigue 30 (2008) p.1137.

Google Scholar

[13] C.M. Sonsino: Konstruktion 2005 No. 4, p.87.

Google Scholar

[14] Y. Murakami et al.: Fatigue Fract. Engng. Mater. Struct. 25 (2002) p.735.

Google Scholar

[15] H. Berns, W. Trojahn: VDI-Z 1985, 127 (22) p.889.

Google Scholar

[16] C. Sohar et al.: Int. J. Fatigue 30 (2008) p.2191.

Google Scholar

[17] K. Shiozawa et al.: Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 28 (2006) p.1521.

Google Scholar