Comparison of the Heat Treatment Response of SSM-HPDC 6082 and 6004 Wrought Alloys with A356 and F357 Casting Alloys

Heinrich Möller; Gonasagren Govender; Waldo Stumpf

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.690.53

Paper Titles

The Assessment of Impact of Construction Factors on Weldability of MSRB Alloy
p.37

Assessment of High-Temperature Brittleness Range of the Casted Alloy AZ91
p.41

A Study of the Influence of Strain Hardening and Precipitation Hardening Sequence on Development of Mechanical Properties of AlMgSi Conductor Alloys
p.45

Novel Grain Refiner for Hypo- and Hyper-Eutectic Al-Si Alloys
p.49

Comparison of the Heat Treatment Response of SSM-HPDC 6082 and 6004 Wrought Alloys with A356 and F357 Casting Alloys
p.53

Anisotropy of Flow during Forging of Rolled AZ31B Plate in Transverse Direction
p.57

Castability of some Magnesium Alloys in a Novel Castability Die
p.61

Magnesium Permanent Mold Castings Optimization
p.65

Mechanical Properties of Mill-Annealed Ti6Al4V Investment Cast
p.69

HomeMaterials Science ForumMaterials Science Forum Vol. 690Comparison of the Heat Treatment Response of...

Comparison of the Heat Treatment Response of SSM-HPDC 6082 and 6004 Wrought Alloys with A356 and F357 Casting Alloys

Abstract:

Semi-solid metal high pressure die casting was used to produce plates from traditional wrought Al-Mg-Si alloys 6082 and 6004, as well as from traditional casting Al-Si-Mg alloys A356 and F357. The high Si-content of the casting alloys offer several advantages, including a faster artificial aging response, higher strength for comparable Mg contents and less sensitivity to prior natural aging on peak strength. However, over-aging occurs earlier in the casting alloys than in the wrought alloys.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 690)

Pages:

53-56

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.690.53

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

June 2011

Authors:

Heinrich Möller, Gonasagren Govender, Waldo Stumpf

Keywords:

Aluminium Alloy, Artificial Ageing, Natural Aging, Rheocasting

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] I. Polmear: Light alloys: from traditional alloys to nanocrystals (Butterworth-Heinemann, Amsterdam, 2006).

Google Scholar

[2] B. Rinderer, M. Couper, X. Xiong, S. Gao and J-F. Nie: Mater. Sci. Forum Vol. 654-656 (2010), p.590.

Google Scholar

[3] R. Vissers, M.A van Huis, J. Jansen, H.W. Zandbergen, C.D. Marioara and S.J. Andersen: Acta Mater. Vol. 55 (2007), p.3815.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.02.032

Google Scholar

[4] H. Möller, G. Govender, W.E. Stumpf and P.C. Pistorius: Int. J. Cast Met. Res. Vol. 23 (2010), p.37.

Google Scholar

[5] U.A. Curle: Trans. Nonferr. Met. Soc. China Vol. 20 (2010), p.1719.

Google Scholar

[6] R. Bruwer, J.D. Wilkins, L.H. Ivanchev, P. Rossouw and O.F.R.A. Damm, US Patent 7,368,690. (2008).

Google Scholar

[7] H. Möller, G. Govender and W.E. Stumpf: Solid State Phenom. Vol. 141-143 (2008), p.737.

Google Scholar

[8] J. Royset, T. Stene, J.A. Saeter and O. Reiso: Mater. Sci. Forum Vol. 519-521 (2006), p.239.

Google Scholar

[9] C.S.T. Chang, I. Wieler, N. Wanderka and J. Banhart: Ultramicroscopy Vol. 109 (2009), p.585.

Google Scholar

[10] A.K. Gupta, D.J. Lloyd and S.A Court: Mater. Sci Eng. Vol. A316 (2001), p.11.

Google Scholar