Fracture Mechanics of Conventional and Narrow Groove Pulse Current Gas Metal Arc Welds of HSLA Steel

Article Preview

Abstract:

Mechanical and fracture properties of 20MnMoNi55 grade high strength low alloy (HSLA) steel welds have been studied. The weld joints were made using Gas Tungsten Arc Welding (GTAW), Shielded Metal Arc Welding (SMAW) and Pulse Gas Metal Arc Welding (P-GMAW) methods on conventional V-groove (V-Groove) and Narrow groove (NG-13). The base metal and weld metal were characterised in terms of their metallurgical, mechanical and fracture toughness properties by following ASTM procedures. The J-Integral fracture test was carried out using compact tension C(T) specimen for base and weld metal. The fracture toughness and tensile properties of welds have been correlated with microstructure. In conventional V-groove welds prepared by P-GMAW shows the improvement in initiation fracture toughness (JIC) as compared to the weld prepared by SMAW. Similar improvements in tensile properties have also been observed. This is attributed to reduction in co-axial dendrite content due to lower heat input during P-GMAW process as compared to SMAW. In the narrow groove P-GMA weld prepared at f value of 0.15 has shown relative improvement of JIC as compared to that of the weld prepared by SMAW process.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

451-456

Citation:

Online since:

January 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Tsukada, H., Suzuki, K., Kusuhashi M. and Sato, I., Current Forgings and Their Properties for Steam Generator of Nuclear Plant., The 17th Japanese-German Joint International Seminar, Stuttgart, 29-30 Sept. (1997).

DOI: 10.1520/stp16592s

Google Scholar

[2] Krauss, George, Steels Processing, Structure, and Performance., ASM Internationals Park, Ohio. (2006).

Google Scholar

[3] Quintino, L. and Alllum, C.J., Pulsed GMAW: Interactions between process parameters, Part I., Welding and Metal Fabrication, Vol. 16(4) (1984), pp.126-129.

Google Scholar

[4] Randhawa, H.S., Ghosh., P.K., and Gupta, S.R., Some basic aspects of geometrical characteristics of pulsed current vertical-up GMA weld, ISIJ International, Vol. 40 (1) (2000), pp.71-76.

DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.40.71

Google Scholar

[5] Subramaniam, S., White, D.R., Jones, J.E. and Lyons, D.W., Droplet transfer in pulsed gas metal arc welding of aluminium., Welding Journal, Vol. (11) (1998), pp.458s-464s.

DOI: 10.1179/stw.1998.3.6.304

Google Scholar

[6] Ghosh, P.K., An analysis of weld characteristics as a function of pulse current MIG welding parameters., International Journal on Joining of Materials, Vol. 8(4) (1996), pp.157-161.

Google Scholar

[7] Ghosh, P.K., Decide pulse parameters for desired properties of pulsed current GMA weld., Procd. Int. Weld. Conf. (IWC'99), Welding & Allied Technology Challenges in 21st Century, New Delhi, 15-17 Feb., Vol. I, (1999), p.18.

Google Scholar

[8] Cheng, G., Kuang, Z. B., Lou, Z. W. and Li, H., Experimental investigation of fatigue behaviour for welded joint with mechanical heterogeneity., Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, vol. 67, (1996), p.229–242.

DOI: 10.1016/0308-0161(94)00020-4

Google Scholar

[9] ASTM E-562-08, Standard Test Method for Determining Volume Fraction by Systematic Manual Point Count., (2008), pp.1-7.

Google Scholar

[10] ASTM standard E-1820-08, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness., (2008) pp.1-48.

Google Scholar

[11] Dieter, G.E., Mechanical Metallurgy, McGraw-Hill book company, UK, (1998).

Google Scholar