Effect of Organic Additives on Friction Properties of Clay Based Compounds

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the traditional heavy-clay industry, compounds are usually prepared by the addition of organic waste material. These additives originate mainly from the wood, food or paper industries. The purpose of this study is to present the results of the examination of friction contact between the wall of the forming die and the clay compounds containing organic additives. Saw dust and ground sunflower seed shell were mixed to clay in 0 wt%, 3 wt% and 5 wt%. The water content of compounds was also varied. The clay and the additives were described by morphology, XRD, bulk density and equivalent diameter. Friction tests were carried out on a special tribometer up to plastic deformation of the sample. The coefficient of friction decreased when normal stress was increased for all the ten compounds. Average results showed that the tendency of change in the value of the coefficient of friction could be divided into three sections: a decreasing, a quasi constant and a shearing section. It follows from this that the coefficient of friction can be characterized with a number only inside the quasi constant section, i.e. between two definable normal stress values. Averaged coefficient of friction was between 0.17 and 0.21 for saw dust and between 0.19 and 0.21 for the compounds with ground sunflower seed shell.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

403-408

Citation:

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] E. Hallmann: Schneckenpressenberechnungen für keramische Stoffe (I-III), Sprechsaal vol. 116 (1983).

Google Scholar

[2] L.A. Gömze: Choice of Technical Parameters for Screw Presses, Interbrick 2 (1986) 30-34.

Google Scholar

[3] C. Djelal: Designing and perfecting a tribometer for the study of friction of a concentrated clay-water mixture against a metallic surface, Materials and Structures 34 (2001) 51-58.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02482200

Google Scholar

[4] W. Hoffmann, H. Berger: Flow simulation in the Ceramic Industry, Ziegelindustrie International 4 (2000) 13-16.

Google Scholar

[5] F. Laenger: Designing an extruder with allowance for the properties of ceramic extrusion compounds, Part 1-5, German Ceramic Society Report Vol 69 (1992) 3-8.

Google Scholar

[6] F. Handle: Numerically optimized extrusion auxiliaries 1, Ziegelindustrie Int. 1/2 (2001) 31-36.

Google Scholar

[7] H. Riegger, W. Wahl: Wear prevention in the heavy clay industry, Ziegelindustrie International 5 (2005) 44-51.

Google Scholar

[8] I. Kocserha: Friction properties of clay minerals. Proceeding of International Conference of PhD Students ISBN 963 661 585 3Ö (2003) 347-353.

Google Scholar

[9] W. Blümel, N. Dixon: British-German cooperative research on geosynthetic friction testing methods, Information on www. ggu. de.

Google Scholar

[10] Gömze, L.A.: Mathematical principles of effectivity increase of smooth rollers in the ceramic industry II, Építőanyag 32/9 (1980) 339–345.

Google Scholar

[11] H. Yamamoto, K. Morichi, H. Matsuoka, Y. Tanaka, D.A. Sun: Frictional behaviour between clay and steel by direct shear type apparatus. Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials, (2003).

DOI: 10.1201/noe9058096043.ch30

Google Scholar

[12] F. Hammoud: A microstructural study of the behaviour of large displacement interfacial shearing between a cohesive soil and steel, 2nd International Conference on New Developments in Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (2009) 320-327.

Google Scholar

[13] W. H. Tan, C. Y. Lee, T. Sivadass: Behaviour of Clay-Steel Interfaces, http: /www. uniten. edu. my, ICCBT (2008) 11-20.

Google Scholar

[14] Albert J.: Clays in Brick Industry, Akadémiai kiadó (1967).

Google Scholar

[15] Gömze, L.A., Kocserha, I., Czél, Gy.: Combined rheo–tribometer, Hungarian patent Nr. U0200079. (2002).

Google Scholar

[16] Y. Tsubakihara, H. Kishida, T. Nishiyama: Friction between cohesive soils and steel, Soils and Foundations (1993) 145–156.

DOI: 10.3208/sandf1972.33.2_145

Google Scholar