Limitations in Measuring the Flow Stress

György Krallics; András Reé; Kristóf Bobor; Viktor Szombathelyi

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.752.85

Paper Titles

Description of the PM Process by Using Ishikawa-Analysis
p.48

Effect of High Rotating Magnetic Field on the Solidified Structure of Al–7wt.%Si–1wt.%Fe Alloy
p.57

The Constitutive Behavior of Al 7075 Aluminium Alloy under Hot Compression Test
p.69

Microstructure Characterization of Deep-Drawn DP780-Grade Dual Phase Steel
p.75

Limitations in Measuring the Flow Stress
p.85

Residual Stress Evolution during Fatigue Test of a Shoot Peened Steel Sample
p.95

Determination of the Onset of the Dynamic Recystallization of a 7075 Al Alloy
p.105

Modelling of Crown on Cold Rolled Aluminium Sheet
p.115

Development of a Complex Optimizing Model of Wire Drawing Technology
p.125

HomeMaterials Science ForumMaterials Science Forum Vol. 752Limitations in Measuring the Flow Stress

Limitations in Measuring the Flow Stress

Abstract:

In designing of plastic metalworking technologies, one determining amount used is the flow stress (kf ) of the material to be formed. A few experimental methods are used to measure it, but in all case it is intended to establish a specific stress and strain state in the whole volume of the specimen, or at least in its majority. In our work the limitations of upsetting in axial symmetrical and plane strain states were investigated by FE modeling and experimental methods within cold working conditions. Both methods were executed on traditional testing machines and Gleeble 3800 thermo-mechanical simulator. It was intended to determine the flow stress up to as high strain values as possible. The processing of the experimental results showed, reliable flow stress values were obtainable in the equivalent strain range of 0 to 3 using the step-by-step upsetting in plane strain, and in the 0 to 1.2 range by cylindrical upsetting.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Materials Science at University of Miskolc

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 752)

Pages:

85-94

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.752.85

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

March 2013

Authors:

György Krallics, András Reé, Kristóf Bobor, Viktor Szombathelyi

Keywords:

Cylindrical Upsetting, FE Modeling, Flow Stress, Watts-Ford Method

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] Bridgeman, P.W.: Studies in Large Plastic Flow and Fracture, McGraw-Hill, (1952).

Google Scholar

[2] Ettuney, O. Hardt, D.E.: A Method for in-Process Failure Prediction in Cold Upset Forging, Journal of Engineering for Industry, 105 (1983) 161-167.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3185883

Google Scholar

[3] Rastegaev, M.V.: New Method of Homogeneous Upsetting of Specimens for Determining the Flow Stress and the Coefficients of Inner Friction - Zavodszkaja Laboratorija, N3 (1940) 354 (in Russian).

Google Scholar

[4] Kroha, V.A.: Flow curves in cold forming, Masinostroenije, 1968. p.131 (in Russian).

Google Scholar

[5] Watts, A.B., Ford, H.: Proc. Instn. Mech. Eng., 1B (1952/53) 448-464.

Google Scholar

[6] Watts, A.B., Ford, H.: Proc. Instn. Mech. Eng., 169 (1955) 1141-1156.

Google Scholar

[7] Reé, A.: Flow curves related to constant strain rate Periodica Politechnica – Mech. Eng. 16 (1972) 39-45.

Google Scholar

[8] Semiatin, S.L. Altan, T.: Measurement and Interpretation of Flow Stress Data for the Simulation of Metal-Forming Processes, Journal Article Preprint, January (2010).

DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v22b.a0005508

Google Scholar

[9] Reé A., Bobor K., Krállics Gy.: Az alakítási szilárdság meghatározásának problémái XIV. Képlékenyalakító Konferencia, 2012. 02. 16-17, Miskolc (in Hungarian).

Google Scholar