Geopolymerics Adhesives for Joint Steel Plates

Article Preview

Abstract:

The process of bonding degradation throughout the whole loading phase up to the total collapse has been investigated by models of interlaminar degradation in composite materials and subsequently adapted to the problem of structural bonding. The physical phenomenon represented by these models is exactly the same that must be studied in the case of metal plates adhered with geopolymers: the adhesion between substrates. In this work, it was investigated the adherence of joint steel plates through propagation tests of clefts in mixed mode MMF (Mixed-Mode Flexure Test) which combine the efforts of traction (due to differential thermal expansion) and shear (due the slipping and preassure due the own weight of the adhered layers), in other words, modes I (pure opening) and II (pure shear) of propagation, being one of the most common glued plates. It was used two types of geopolymeric adhesives (one made of metakaolinite and another with weathered soil) activated with sodium silicate. The bonded systems were subjected to temperatures between 55°C and 600°C in order to evaluate its potential against the use of epoxy-based adhesives. The substrates used were steel. In general, the adhesives made of metakaolinite had better adhesion.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

133-137

Citation:

Online since:

June 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. Barquins and K. Fadel: Adhesion et collage Decouverte Vol. 271 (1999), pp.31-46.

Google Scholar

[2] D.A. Dillard and A.V. Pocius: Adhesion science and engineering Vol. 1. (2002)

Google Scholar

[3] V.F. Stroganov, D. E. Strakhov, K. P. Alekseev and I. V. Stroganov: Polymer Science Vol. 49-3 (2004), pp.269-271.

Google Scholar

[4] V.F.F Barbosa. and K.J.D. Mackenzie: Materials Research Bulletin Vol 38 (2002), pp.319-331.

Google Scholar

[5] A. Palomo, M.T.B. Varela, M.T. Granizo, F. Puertas, T. Varquez and M.W. Grutzeck: Cement and Concrete Research Vol. 29 (1999), pp.997-1004.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(99)00074-5

Google Scholar

[6] J. Davidovits, Properties of geopolymer cements", Proceedings First International Conference on Alkaline Cements and Concretes, Kiev, Ukraine (1994), p.131.

Google Scholar

[7] B.A. Latella, D.S. Perera, T.R. Escott and D.J Cassidy: Journal of Material Science Vol. 41 (2006), pp.1261-1264.

Google Scholar

[8] J. Davidovits: Journal of Thermal Analysis, Vol. 37 (1991), p.1633.

Google Scholar

[9] H. Wang, H. Li and F. Yan: Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, Vol. 268 (2005), pp.1-6.

Google Scholar

[10] K.C. Gomes, S.M. Torres, S.De Barros and N.P. Barbosa, in: Solid Mechanics in Brazil 09 edited by H. S. C. Mattos, M. Alves, Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas Vol. 2 (2009).

Google Scholar

[11] S. De Barros, K.C. Gomes, J.R. De Souza, N.P. Barbosa and S.M. Torres: Materials Science Forum Vol. 643 (2010); pp.143-146.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.643.143

Google Scholar

[12] R.F. Sampaio, J.M.L. Reis, V.A. Perrut and H.S. Costa-Mattos: Journal of Pipeline Engineering Vol. 7 (2007), p.1.

Google Scholar

[13] K.C. Gomes, G.S.T. Lima, S.M. Torres, S. De Barros, I.F. Vasconcelos and N.P. Barbosa: Materials Science Forum Vol. 643 (2010), pp.131-138.

Google Scholar