Comparison of Environmental Impact Analysis of Two Typical Construction Windows Production

Shu Ping Wang; Zhi Hong Wang; Wen Juan Chen; Xian Zheng Gong; Yu Liu; Li Ping Ma

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.787.97

Paper Titles

Development Model of Circular Eco-Industrial Park for Comprehensive Utilization of Coal Gangue in Coal Enterprise
p.71

Adsorption of Lanthanum (III)-Iron (III)-Doped Waste Coal Fly Ash Composite Adsorbent for Reactive Dyes from Aqueous Solution
p.76

Removal of Terephthalic Acid from Waste Water Using Diatomite Adsorbent
p.82

Removal of Indoor Formaldehyde with Nanoscale Catalytic Oxidation
p.92

Comparison of Environmental Impact Analysis of Two Typical Construction Windows Production
p.97

Life Cycle Assessment of Steel Production
p.102

Life Cycle Assessment of Rock Wool Board and EPS Board
p.106

Study on the Recovery and Recycling Standard System of Abandoned Fluorescent Lamps in China
p.111

Life Cycle Assessment of Heavy-Duty Truck for Highway Transport in China
p.117

HomeMaterials Science ForumMaterials Science Forum Vol. 787Comparison of Environmental Impact Analysis of Two...

Comparison of Environmental Impact Analysis of Two Typical Construction Windows Production

Abstract:

The energy consumption of window accounts for nearly half of buildings. The purpose of this study is to compare the environmental impact of plastic windows and aluminum alloy windows production, including resource and energy consumption, waste emission. The result shows that energy consumption of plastic window production is only 0.24 times of aluminum alloy window production, and the overall environmental impact of the former is 30% of the later. This study is a quantitative description of energy consumption and environmental impact of two windows production pattern, which intends to fill the blank in LCA field of windows in China.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Energy, Environment and Functional Materials

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 787)

Pages:

97-101

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.787.97

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

April 2014

Authors:

Shu Ping Wang, Zhi Hong Wang, Wen Juan Chen*, Xian Zheng Gong, Yu Liu, Li Ping Ma

Keywords:

Building Material, Environmental Impact, LCA, Windows Production

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] S.Y. Song, Technology information (buildings material). 7 (2011) 87-88.

Google Scholar

[2] T.T. Liu, H.F. Xu, Y.Z. Hou, Architectural Technology, 7 (2012) 618-622.

Google Scholar

[3] W.W. Liu, Architectural Technology, 10 (2010) 193.

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Li, Journal of doors and windows. 11 (2011) 29-32.

Google Scholar

[5] H. Chen, W.CH. Hao, F. Shi, T.M. Wang, ACTA scuentiae circumstantiates. 24 (2004) 545-549.

Google Scholar

[6] N. Ding. Life cycle assessment of typical aluminum alloys, Ph.D. Dissertation of Beijing University of Technology 2012.

Google Scholar

[7] X.H. Di, Z.R. Nie, B.R. Yuan, et al., Int J LCA, 12, 4 (2007) 217-224.

Google Scholar

[8] J.X. Yang, C. Xu, R.S. Wang, Methodology and application of product life cycle assessment. Beijing: Weather Press (2002).

Google Scholar

[9] B.R. Yuan, Measurement Method for Sustainable Development of Chemical Industry and Its Application, Ph.D. Dissertation of Beijing University of Technology (2006).

Google Scholar

[10] L.P.Ma, Z.H. Wang, X.Z. Gong, et al., Progress in materials science and engineering(2006) 3-8.

Google Scholar

[11] Jeroen B, et al. Life cycle assessment: An operational guide to the ISO standards. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.

Google Scholar

[12] F. Gao, Z.R. Nie, ZH.H. Wang, et al., Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 52, 1 (2009) 215-222.

Google Scholar