Prediction Model for Adhesive Thickness-Dependence of Bonding Structures for Aeronautic Lightweight Alloy

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the present research, the influence of the adhesive thickness on the cohesive properties and the overall strength of metallic adhesive bonding structures were investigated with the cohesive zone model to equivalently simulate the adhesive layers with various thicknesses. A theoretical approach was developed to determine the cohesive parameters for the present model when the adhesive thickness varied. And then some numerical examples were given to explore the adhesive thickness-dependence overall strength of the adhesive joints, followed by the comparison with the existing experimental results. Furthermore, the variations of both the cohesive parameters and the overall strength with the various thicknesses were influenced by the ductility of adhesives, which were investigated finally. The results showed that both the cohesive parameters and overall strength of metallic adhesive bonding structures were dependent on the adhesive thickness. Moreover, the variation of overall strength corresponding to brittle adhesive was more remarkable compared to that of ductile adhesive, especially in the comparatively small thickness range.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

580-586

Citation:

Online since:

April 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] L.F.M. da Silva, T.N.S.S. Rodrigues, M.A.V. Figueiredo, M.F.S.F. de Moura and J.A.G. Chousal, Effect of adhesive type and thickness on the lap shear strength, J. Adhes. 82(2006) 1091–1115.

DOI: 10.1080/00218460600948511

Google Scholar

[2] T.T.R. Khoo and H. Kim, Effect of Bondline Thickness on Mixed-Mode Fracture of Adhesively Bonded Joints, J. Adhes. 87(2011) 989–1019.

DOI: 10.1080/00218464.2011.600668

Google Scholar

[3] D.B. Lee, T. Ikeda, N. Miyazaki and N.S. Choi, Effect of bond thickness on fracture toughness of adhesive joints, J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 126(2004) 14–18.

DOI: 10.1115/1.1631433

Google Scholar

[4] S. Marzi, A. Biel and U. Stigh, On experimental methods to investigate the effect of layer thickness on the fracture behavior of adhesively bonded joints, Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 31(2011) 840–850.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.08.004

Google Scholar

[5] P.P. Camanho, C.G. Davila and M.F. de Moura, Numerical simulation of mixed-mode progressive delamination in composite materials, J. Compos. Mater. 37(2003) 1415–1438.

DOI: 10.1177/0021998303034505

Google Scholar

[6] N. Chandra, H. Li, C. Shet and H. Ghonem, Some issues in the application of cohesive zone models for metal-ceramic interfaces, Int. J. Solids. Struct. 39(2002) 2827–55.

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7683(02)00149-x

Google Scholar

[7] J.L. Högberg, Mixed mode cohesive law, Int. J. Fract. 141(2006) 549–559.

DOI: 10.1007/s10704-006-9014-9

Google Scholar

[8] P.A. Gustafson and A.M. Waas, The influence of adhesive constitutive parameters in cohesive zone finite element models of adhesively bonded joints, Int. J. Solids. Struct. 46(2009) 2201–2215.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.11.016

Google Scholar

[9] T. Pardoen, T. Ferracin, C.M. Landis and F. Delannay, Constraint effects in adhesive joint fracture, J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 53(2005) 1951–1983.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2005.04.009

Google Scholar

[10] G. Ji, Z. Ouyang and G. Li, On the interfacial constitutive laws of mixed mode fracture with various adhesive thicknesses, Mech. Mater. 47(2012) 24–32.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2012.01.002

Google Scholar

[11] G.F. Ji, Z.Y. Ouyang and G.Q. Li, Effects of bondline thickness on Mode-II interfacial laws of bonded laminated composite plate, Int. J. Fract. 168(2011) 197–207.

DOI: 10.1007/s10704-010-9571-9

Google Scholar

[12] G.F. Ji, Z.Y. Ouyang, G.Q. Li, S. Ibekwe and S.S. Pang, Effects of adhesive thickness on global and local Mode-I interfacial fracture of bonded joints, Int. J. Solids. Struct. 47(2010) 2445–2458.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.05.006

Google Scholar