Milling Forces of Compacted Graphite Iron (CGI) and Gray Iron (GI)

Article Preview

Abstract:

Compacted graphite iron (CGI) has excellent comprehensive performance of strength, hardness, abrasion resistance, shock absorption and thermal conductivity as an ideal material for making engine parts. The material performance of CGI is compared with that of gray iron (GI) and spheroidal graphite Iron (SGI). Some research shows that the strong adhesion between the iron and the graphite forms semi-continuous chips when machining CGI which requires more energy than GI cutting, and there's no MnS layer on the cutting edge during CGI cutting. Thus, the cutting tool life of CGI is greatly reduced than GI. The experiment results indicate that the cutting forces of CGI milling are much higher than that of GI when the feed and the depth of cut increase.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 800-801)

Pages:

32-36

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Dawson, S. Compacted Graphite Iron: Mechanical and physical properties for engine design. 1999, V D I-V D E - VERLAG GMBH: DUSSELDORF. pp.85-105.

Google Scholar

[2] Hanquan Qiu, Cheng Zhengde. The 40 Years of Vermicular Graphite Cast Iron in China(I). China Foundry Machinery & Technology, 2006(1): pp.1-9.

Google Scholar

[3] Dawson, S. et al. The effect of metallurgical variables on the machinability of compacted graphite iron. SAE Transactions: Journal of Materials \& Manufacturing, 2001. 110: pp.334-352.

Google Scholar

[4] Dawson, S. Compacted graphite iron - A material solution for modern diesel engine cylinder blocks and heads. CHINA FOUNDRY, 2009. 6(3): pp.241-246.

Google Scholar

[5] Dawson, S. and T. Schroeder, Compacted Graphite Iron: A Viable Alternative. Engineering Casting Solutions AFS, (2000).

Google Scholar

[6] Abele, E. A. Sahm and H. Schulz, Wear mechanism when machining compacted graphite iron. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 2002. 51(1): pp.53-56.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)61464-4

Google Scholar

[7] Sahm, A. E. Abele and H. Schulz, Machining of compacted graphite iron (CGI). Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik, 2002. 33(9): pp.501-506.

DOI: 10.1002/1521-4052(200209)33:9<501::aid-mawe501>3.0.co;2-w

Google Scholar

[8] George, G. CGI high-speed machining machining. World Manufacturing Engineering & Market , 2005(06): pp.89-93.

Google Scholar

[9] Gabaldo, S. et al. Performance of carbide and ceramic tools in the milling of compact graphite iron-CGI. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2010. 32(SPE): pp.511-517.

DOI: 10.1590/s1678-58782010000500011

Google Scholar

[10] Heck, M. et al. Analytical investigations concerning the wear behaviour of cutting tools used for the machining of compacted graphite iron and grey cast iron. International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials, 2008. 26(3): pp.197-206.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2007.05.003

Google Scholar

[11] Da Silva, M.B. et al. Analysis of wear of cemented carbide cutting tools during milling operation of gray iron and compacted graphite iron. Wear, 2011. 271(9): pp.2426-2432.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2010.11.030

Google Scholar

[12] Pereira, A.A. L. Boehs and W.L. Guesser, The influence of sulfur on the machinability of gray cast iron FC25. Journal of materials processing technology, 2006. 179(1): pp.165-171.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.03.100

Google Scholar

[13] Heck, M. et al. Analytical investigations concerning the wear behaviour of cutting tools used for the machining of compacted graphite iron and grey cast iron. International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials, 2008. 26(3): pp.197-206.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2007.05.003

Google Scholar

[14] Grenmyr, G. et al. Analysis of Tool Wear in CGI Machining. IMETI 2008: International Multl-conference on Engineering and Technological Innovation , Vol I, Proceedings, 2008: pp.34-39.

Google Scholar

[15] Gastel, M. et al. Investigation of the wear mechanism of cubic boron nitride tools used for the machining of compacted graphite iron and grey cast iron. International Journal of Refractory Metals & Hard Materials 2000. 18(6): pp.287-296.

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-4368(00)00032-9

Google Scholar

[16] Derek, K. Challenges In Cutting CGI. Modern Manufacturing, 2008(28): pp.70-71.

Google Scholar