Determination of Surface Roughness in Turning of Aluminum Bronze Alloy (UNS С 63020) Using Cutting Tools with Carbide Geometry Positive and Negative

Daniel Assis Amancio; José Veríssimo Ribeiro de Toledo; João Roberto Ferreira; Mírian de Lourdes Noronha Motta Melo; Gilbert Silva; Luiz Eduardo Paes

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.805.368

Paper Titles

Influence of the Residue of Casting by Lost Wax in the Modulus of Elasticity and Porosity of Concretes
p.343

Portland Cement for the Cementing of Oil Wells Developed with the Aid of the Rietveld Refinement Method
p.350

Drawing Tantalum Encapsulated in the Cooper Pipe
p.356

Microstructural and Mechanical Characterization of the Niobium Cold Deformed-Swage
p.362

Determination of Surface Roughness in Turning of Aluminum Bronze Alloy (UNS С 63020) Using Cutting Tools with Carbide Geometry Positive and Negative
p.368

Morphological Analysis of Chip Generated by the Process of Turning on Bronze Aluminium Industry Used in Aeronautics via Electronic Scanning Microscopy
p.374

Sensitivity on Numerical Weather Prediction in the Northwest of Spain
p.380

High-Velocity Impact Comminution of Magnetite
p.386

Efficiency as a Road to Sustainability in Small Scale Mining
p.395

HomeMaterials Science ForumMaterials Science Forum Vol. 805Determination of Surface Roughness in Turning of...

Determination of Surface Roughness in Turning of Aluminum Bronze Alloy (UNS С 63020) Using Cutting Tools with Carbide Geometry Positive and Negative

Abstract:

In today's industry, production processes evolve every day, together with the development of new materials and geometries for tools and machines more accurate and efficient. These new technologies allow more flexible processes, such as replacement of the grinding process by turning of hardened materials. This change brings significant reductions in costs of tooling, setup time and machining.This work is a study of the conditions for turning aerospace alloy - Bronze Aluminum (UNS 63020)-hardened and tempered with a hardness of 35 HRC with carbide tools with positive and negative geometry.We analyzed the surface roughness of the specimen and as a criterion for end of life of the cutting tool was used to flank wear, crater wear, chip on the tool and/or the breach thereof.All the cutting parameters, when in their highest levels, do not contribute significantly to the reduction in tool life, while the surface roughness for the increase in the feed (f) and the cutting speed (vc) showed a greater influence on surface finish of the piece.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

A Special Issue in Memory of Dr. Lucio Salgado

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 805)

Pages:

368-373

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.805.368

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2014

Authors:

Daniel Assis Amancio*, José Veríssimo Ribeiro de Toledo, João Roberto Ferreira, Mírian de Lourdes Noronha Motta Melo, Gilbert Silva, Luiz Eduardo Paes

Keywords:

Aluminum Bronze, Carbide, Machining, Turning Tools

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] E.A Diniz,. Machining Technology of Materials. (Artliber Sao Paulo 2008).

Google Scholar

[2] B. Singer, H. Assender and P. Grant: Aerospace Materials: (Institute of Physics London, 2001).

Google Scholar

[3] Copper Development Association (CDA). (1986). "Aluminum Bronze for Industry." CDA Publication No 83.

Google Scholar

[4] D. Ferraresi: Fundamentals of Machining Materials. (Edgard Blücher Ltda. Sao Paulo, 1977).

Google Scholar

[5] Sandvik: Technical catalog of the manufacturer of tools. (Sandvik Coromant2010).

Google Scholar

[6] E.A. Diniz, And, P.Y. Noritomi, "Influence of cutting parameters on surface roughness of turned parts." XIV Brazilian Congress of Mechanical Engineering, 1, 1-8. Campinas. Brazil (1997)..

Google Scholar