Application of 2D-3D Surface Geometrical Features in Tribological Analysis of Ceramics and Ceramic Layers

Article Preview

Abstract:

Microgeometrical characteristics of the surface of engineering components operating in wear condition are important features influencing the wear process of the tribological system. Beside the widely used common 2D roughness parameters – e.g. the Ra, arithmetical mean roughness, Rz, ten point mean roughness, or Rmr, material ratio, etc. – the 3D roughness features (Sa, Sz Smr) provide potentially new means for geometrical description of the operating surfaces. Our paper aims at contributing an overview on the available 2D and 3D features, giving their definition and their potential use in multi-scale characterization of components used especially in wear type loading conditions. An interesting question is the relationship between the 2D and 3D roughness parameters and their information content, relating to tribological problems. Besides giving a systematic overview of the most important parameters applicable in wear analyses we also present examples of 2D and 3D roughness data determined on surface of nitrocarburised steels, as well as silicon nitride ceramics. A special emphasis is placed on those parameters which can be most efficiently used during wear damage analyses of ceramic materials.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

435-440

Citation:

Online since:

February 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Marko Sedlaček, Bojan Podgornik, Jože Vižintin: Correlation between standard roughness parameters skewness and kurtosis and tribological behaviour of contact surfaces, Tribology International, Volume 48, April 2012, Pages 102-112.

DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2011.11.008

Google Scholar

[2] E.S. Gadelmawla, M.M. Koura, T.M.A. Maksoud, I.M. Elewa, H.H. Soliman: Roughness parameters, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Volume 123, Issue 1, 10 April 2002, Pages 133-145.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(02)00060-2

Google Scholar

[3] L. De Chiffre, S. Christiansen, S. Skade: Advantages and Industrial Applications of Three-Dimensional Surface Roughness Analysis, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, Volume 43, Issue 1, 1994, Pages 473-478.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)62256-2

Google Scholar

[4] N.K. Myshkin, A. Ya. Grigoriev, S.A. Chizhik, K.Y. Choi, M.I. Petrokovets: Surface roughness and texture analysis in microscale, Wear, Volume 254, Issue 10, July 2003, Pages 1001-1009.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1648(03)00306-5

Google Scholar

[5] S.F. Tian, L.T. Jiang, Q. Guo, G.H. Wu: Effect of surface roughness on tribological properties of TiB2/Al composites, Materials & Design, Volume 53, January 2014, Pages 129-136.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.06.038

Google Scholar

[6] K.P. Shaha, Y.T. Pei, D. Martinez-Martinez, J. Th.M. De Hosson: Influence of hardness and roughness on the tribological performance of TiC/a-C nanocomposite coatings, Surface and Coatings Technology, Volume 205, Issue 7, 25 December 2010, Pages 2624-2632.

DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.10.021

Google Scholar