Non-Destructive Surface Diagnostics of Tools

Miroslav Džupon; Ján Balko; Janette Brezinová

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.818.41

Paper Titles

Adhesive Bonding Technology at Car - Body Structure – Application of New Coating with Layer Zn/Mg
p.23

Testing of PVD Hard Coatings Applied to Coining Dies
p.27

Study of Selected Properties of Coatings Devoted to Extreme Tribo-Corrosive Conditions
p.32

Influence of Electrodeposited Coatings on Ultra-High-Cycle Fatigue Life of S235 Structural Steel
p.37

Non-Destructive Surface Diagnostics of Tools
p.41

Surface Finish Techniques for FDM Parts
p.45

Evaluation of AlTiCrN Coatings Surface after Tribological Tests
p.49

Assessment of the Properties of Paint Films Containing Surface-Treated Silicates
p.53

Influence of Deformation on the Damage of Zn-Mg Based Protective Coating
p.57

HomeMaterials Science ForumMaterials Science Forum Vol. 818Non-Destructive Surface Diagnostics of Tools

Non-Destructive Surface Diagnostics of Tools

Abstract:

The aim of the study was to validate non-destructive diagnostics of surface of tools and metal sheets after steel grit blasting. We used replicas produced by fy Struers, known under commercial name RepliSet-F5. The replicas were extracted from surfaces of thirty specimens with PVD coatings (CrN, TiCN) and from flat specimens after steel grit blasting. Qualitative and quantitative parameters characteristic of surface morphology were determined by means of an optical profilometer, and confocal microscope was used for surface contactless metrology measurements. We observed a qualitative coincidence of morphological images of original surfaces and replicas. The values of the quantitative parameter Sa (Arithmetic mean height according to ISO 25178) of surfaces and replicas extracted from them differed at the second decimal place. Replicas document well the surface morphology and allow one to obtain information about the state of surface in difficult-to-access sites of the tools or constructions.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Surface Engineering and Materials in Mechanical Engineering

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 818)

Pages:

41-44

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.818.41

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

May 2015

Authors:

Miroslav Džupon, Ján Balko, Janette Brezinová*

Keywords:

Confocal Microscopy, PVD Coating, Replica, Tool Surface

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] H.N. Hansen, R.J. Hocken, G. Tosello, Replication of micro and nano surface geometries, CIRP Annals –Manufacturing Technology 60 (2011) 695–714.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2011.05.008

Google Scholar

[2] J.A. Newman, S.A. Willard, S. W Smith, R.S. Piascik, Replica-based crack inspection, Eng. Fract. Mech. 76 (2009) 898–910.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.12.012

Google Scholar

[3] Y.C. Liu, C.Y. Ling, A.A. Malcolm, Z.G. Dong, Accuracy of replication for non-destructive surface finish measurement, SINCE2011, Singapore International NDT Conference & Exhibition, (2011).

Google Scholar

[4] J.B. Jordon, J.D. Bernard, J.C. Newman Jr., Quantifying microstructurally small fatigue crack growth in an aluminum alloy using a silicon-rubber replica method, Int. J. Fatigue 36 (2012) 206–210.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.07.016

Google Scholar

[5] Information on http: /www. struers. com/resources/elements/12/189606/Repliset%20brochure %20English. pdf.

Google Scholar

[6] STN EN ISO 25 178-2: 2012, Geometrical product specifications (GPS) – Surface texture: Areal – Part 2: Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters, SÚTN, (2012).

DOI: 10.3403/30154352u

Google Scholar