The Effect of Additives Including Metakaolin on the Freeze Resistance of Concrete

Article Preview

Abstract:

With the help of research studies on the freeze resistance of concrete with complex additives containing metakaolin it is found that its optimum amount with microsilica and plasticizing agents can provide concrete with high freeze resistance of F11000 and more. The use of metakaolin – superplasticizing admixture contributes to a slight increase of freeze resistance of concrete only due to the consolidation of its structure as a result of increasing the degree of hydration of main minerals of concrete С3S and β-С2S under the influence of metakaolin. It is proved that the optimal amount of metakaolin together with superplasticizing admixture helps to form the phase composition of cement stone from highly basic hydrosilicates and stable hydroaluminates. The use of overdosed metakaolin leads to appearance of a great number of metastable hydroaluminates in the cement stone which makes it inefficient for the production of freeze-proof concrete.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

263-268

Citation:

Online since:

February 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] T.C. Powers, The thermodynamics of volume change and creep, Mater. Struct. 1(6) (1968) 487-507.

Google Scholar

[2] T.C. Pauehrs, Fizicheskaya struktura portlandcementnogo testa, Himiya cementa, Strojizdat, Moscow, (1969).

Google Scholar

[3] G.I. Gorchakov, L.A. Alimov, V.V. Voronin, A.V. Akimov, Zavisimost morozostojkosti betonov ot ih struktury I temperaturnyh deformacij. Beton i zhelezobeton. 10 (1972) 9-10.

Google Scholar

[4] I.I. Lifanov, Morozostojkost betona i temperaturnye deformacii ego komponentov, Avtoref. Dis. d. t. n, МISI, Moscow, (1977).

Google Scholar

[5] B. Ya. Trofimov, L. Ya. Kramar, Mekhanizm stareniya gidratnyh faz cementnogo kamnya pri ciklicheskom zamorazhivanii, Populyarnoe betonovedenie. 3(29) (2009) 69-83.

Google Scholar

[6] B. Ya. Trofimov, S.P. Gorbunov, Dorozhnye betony povyshennoj morozostojkosti, Cement I ego primenenie. 6 (2011) 66-69.

Google Scholar

[7] B. Ya. Trofimov, K.V. Shuldyakov, Tekhnologiya vysokofunkcionalnyh dorozhnyh betonov. Beton i zhelezobeton – vzglyad v budushchee. Nauchnye trudy III vserossijskoj / II mezhdunarodnoj konferencii po betonu i zhelezobetonu. 5 (2014) 124-138.

Google Scholar

[8] Gost 10060-2012 Betony metody opredeleniya morozostojkosti, Izd-vo standartov, Moscow, (2014).

Google Scholar

[9] Gost 10060-2-95 Betony uskorennye metody opredeleniya morozostojkosti pri mnogovariantnom zamorazhivanii i ottaivanii, Izd-vo standartov, Moscow, (2000).

Google Scholar

[10] Gost 24211-2008 Dobavki dlya betonov i stroitelnyh rastvorov. Obshchie tekhnicheskie usloviya, Izd-vo standartov, Moscow, (2011).

Google Scholar

[11] Gost 30459-2008 Dobavki dlya betonov i stroitelnyh rastvorov. Opredelenie i ocenka effektivnosti, Izd-vo standartov, Moscow, (2008).

Google Scholar

[12] T.V. Kuznecova, Alyuminatnye i sulfoalyuminatnye cement, Strojizdat, Moscow, (1986).

Google Scholar

[13] A.A. Kirsanova, Yu.V. Ionov, A.A. Orlov, L. Ya. Kramar, Osobennosti gidratacii i tverdeniya cementnyh betonov s dobavkami modifikatorami soderzhashchimi metakaolin, Cement i ego primenenie. 2 (2015) 130-135.

Google Scholar